Thanks again by the way Mike . And from experience in New Zealand it was 
pointed out that it can wreak havoc (corrosion) on steel/iron. And Ron G 
questioned the MSDS (but the Navy eats it up, and 22 to zip Seahawks at the 
half?)
The point is good luck and fortune getting 'regular' antifreeze U.L. Listed 
now...

> On Feb 2, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Ya Mike this is one of the good responses I mentioned and the main drawback I 
> have brooded over-  we can put rovers on Mars but we can't keep NaCl2 in 
> pipe? How about CPVC?
> 
>> On Feb 2, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Mike Cabral <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> As I recall Calcium Chloride is very hard to contain. It will weep out of 
>> perfect threaded connection, packing glands etc. Very slippery stuff. 
>> 
>> Mike C 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Feb 2, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In Sep 2010 I posted 'Calcium Chloride Loops'?
>>> Somewhere along the line the thread got renamed, but there was some good 
>>> responses exposing the drawbacks to it replacing combustible antifreeze 
>>> first.
>>> My (lack of) money is on overcoming these drawbacks beating any U.L. Listed 
>>> alcohol based fluid to market-- for residential anyway.
>>> I imagine 1) no city tap hence no tapping fee or BFP, 2) freeze protection 
>>> to -40F, 3) small Gallon high PSI pressure tanks hence K=2.8, 4) limit the 
>>> heat release rate of the most challenging residential fire to 1.6 MW , 
>>> meaning the wet stuff is on the red stuff at about 10 seconds for a small 
>>> room and maybe twice that for a big room.
>>> If I were a maker of auto sprinkler system things (Residential Department) 
>>> this is the direction I would be looking.
>>> 
>>> Brad
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to