I've not found a straight forward correlation regarding fuel loads between  IBC 
and NFPA.  We used both classification strategies and tried to align criteria 
so my sprinkler designer had a solid basis we could both believe in.

When quantities of things that can hurt you, blow you up or otherwise kill you, 
as outlined in detail in IBC 307,  are exceeded (and cross referenced to IBC 
414 control areas) it is no longer B or M but H Use Group.  
It was with these two sections that determined hazard type, limit the amount 
stored, and defined maximum fire areas when we did the combined Ohio EPA/DOH 
labs and various things for other labs like Battelle.  Otherwise we used NFPA 
Chapter 5 hazard and commodity class as warranted before there was an IFC 
(2000).

Just using the straight code language can be difficult.  A copy of the IBC with 
the commentary is indispensable, interspersed between code language is an 
explanation which is often more useful than the code language and quite a bit 
longer.  For instance, the distinction between S and F use fuel loads is not 
mentioned in the IBC code language proper but is discussed in a very useful 
manner in the commentary.  Whereas the hazard group and commodity class 
narrative in NFPA has much more detail.

IFC, on the other hand, combines and further delineates in greater detail 
aspects of NFPA and IBC, citing innumerable sections of both standards.  
Perhaps that is the relation  that for which you are looking.  IBC and IFC 
generalize and categorize materials; it is on the individual item's haz-mat 
sheet that rates of deflagration, conflagration, what oxidizer class and what 
constitutes a lethal dose, etc for each material are defined.

IBC does tell you where you need sprinklers based on a combination of height 
and area, construction type and what is intended to be in the building.  NFPA 
tells you how to do sprinklers that work as intended and contains detail found 
nowhere else.  IFC tries to combine and make sense between the two.

My guess would be the quantities are so small it's a relatively low hazard.

First step is to ask the AHJ which code(s) they recognize.  

ROBERT HOLLAND Jr. AIA, CDT, LEED AP, PMP
ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS / INTERIOR DESIGNERS
7400 West Campus Rd.   Suite 150   New Albany, OH  43054   www.shremshock.com
t 614 545 4550 x 286     f 614 545 4555     [email protected]
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Brad Casterline
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

There is not a complete disconnect between IBC and NFPA 13 Occupancy 
Classifications for required density- the connection is along the lines
of--- if NFPA Classification is based partly on Quantity of the combustibles 
and IBC looks at Use of the space and says we expect 5 lbs fuel/sq.ft at x btu 
blah blah blah so the Fire resistance of the space is yada yada yada...., 
making it a so and so Occupancy, then----make sense? I have been trying for a 
few years to relate density to quantity, combustibility and HRR.

Brad

 
-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

Occupancy doesn't relate to design density but it does determine whether 
sprinklers are required.  B occupancy under most conditions does not require 
sprinklers per code.  But this is a different conversation.......

Craig L. Prahl
Fire Protection Group Lead
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29303
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Cahill, Christopher
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 9:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

How is IBC occupancy classifications relevant to the question of sprinkler
density? There is no correlation IMHO.  That's like saying we ignore 5,000
sq.ft. of rack storage of the plastic packaging where it's in the 100,000
sq.ft. metal widget factory.  Protect the hazard not the occupancy
classification out of a document that is irrelevant to sprinkler design.
Ask the question in an exiting forum and now I'm with you.

To the question, I could go either way.  Though strong lean to OHII because
it may not be a salon for long. Then what is the owner going to do when a
real mercantile comes in.  I haven't been to one in a while.  Aren't there
still aerosols? How about the stock room, assuming they have one?  If it's
truly light amounts of products and the owner understands limitations I
could go along with LH. 

Chris Cahill, PE*
Associate Fire Protection Engineer 
Burns & McDonnell
Phone:  952.656.3652
Fax:  952.229.2923
[email protected]
www.burnsmcd.com
*Registered in: MN


Proud to be #14 on FORTUNE's 2014 List of 100 Best Companies to Work For

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of John Drucker
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

Adding to Bobs cite;

IBC 508.2 Accessory Occupancies 

John Drucker
Assistant Construction Official
Fire Protection Subcode Official
Building/Fire/Electrical Inspector
Borough of Red Bank, NJ
90 Monmouth Street
Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
Cel/Text: 732-904-6823
Email: [email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Bob Holland
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

IBC Section 304, Business Group B, lists 'barber and beauty shops' .

ROBERT HOLLAND Jr. AIA, CDT, LEED AP, PMP ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS / INTERIOR
DESIGNERS
7400 West Campus Rd.   Suite 150   New Albany, OH  43054
www.shremshock.com
t 614 545 4550 x 286     f 614 545 4555     [email protected]

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of John Drucker
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 11:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

Its most likely a B Use, 10% of which may be considered accessory. Code
cites to follow.

John Drucker - Mobile Email
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cell/Text 732-904-6823


"rongreenman ." <[email protected]> wrote:

Is it stand alone or in a strip mall.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Tim Stone <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just check with the AHJ.
>
> Regards,
> G. Tim Stone
>
> G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
> NICET Level III Engineering Technician Fire Protection Sprinkler 
> Design and Consulting Services
>
>                 117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452
> CELL: (802) 373-0638   TEL: (802) 434-2968   Fax: (802) 434-4343
>                            [email protected]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Todd - Work
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 3:52 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Beauty Salon/Day Spa
>
> Tim, If there was a dedicated retail section, I would agree with you.
> However, having a few bottles of shampoo and body oil on a shelf in a 
> room that otherwise looks more like an office I have a hard time 
> justifying as mercantile.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Mar 5, 2015, at 3:36 PM, Tim Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Todd,
> > Usually they sell product too. Mercantile.
> >
> > Regards,
> > G. Tim Stone
> >
> > G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
> > NICET Level III Engineering Technician Fire Protection Sprinkler 
> > Design and Consulting Services
> >
> >                 117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452
> > CELL: (802) 373-0638   TEL: (802) 434-2968   Fax: (802) 434-4343
> >                            [email protected]
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sprinklerforum
> > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of Todd - Work
> > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 3:32 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Beauty Salon/Day Spa
> >
> > Light or Ordinary Hazard. I'm thinking Light because the hazard 
> > can't be much worse than a hospital, but I may be missing something.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > kl
> > er.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > kl
> > er.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
>



--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon,
essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)

A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering,
inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to