The NFPA 13 & IBC occupancy classifications approach things very differently 
and they are different systems.  

While the building code does have a separate system for Types of Construction 
where combustibility of the structure [not the contents] is a factor, its 
occupancy classification system is based on factors not contemplated by NFPA 13.
  
Such factors that are not part of the NFPA 13 classification system include: 
1) whether the occupants are capable of self-preservation[Institutional], 
2) whether large numbers of occupants are present [Assembly], 
3) whether people use it for sleeping purposes [Residential], etc. 

A good example of the difference of these two classification systems can be 
found in the building code's High-Hazard Occupancies in Group H.  While a fire 
protection system is generally required for all Group H occupancies, the NFPA 
13 occupancy hazard classification will vary depending on the fire hazard the 
contents of the building pose, not other hazards to the occupants. The 
sub-categories of Group H vary with the hazard: 
1) a detonation hazard[H-1], 
2) a deflagration hazard [H-2], 
3) a physical hazard [H-3], 
4) a health hazard [H-4], or
5) are a hazardous production material (as in semiconductor fabrication 
facility) [H-5]

So for one example, look at H-3 and the definition of physical hazard, and you 
will see that a building area could be H-3 due to a chemical which is either a 
combustible liquid, a cryogenic fluid, explosive, flammable, organic peroxide, 
oxidizer, oxidizing gas, pyrophoric, unstable (reactive) material, or a 
WATER-REACTIVE material.  

For another, consider that the H-4 health hazard includes chemicals that are 
toxic, highly toxic, and corrosive.  
I think you can see from the above example, a variety of fire hazards and 
levels of fire challenge are possible in the Group H occupancy, and within each 
subcategory of Group H.  

I don't have time to give a contrast about how storage is treated in each code, 
but it could be a good example too.

It would be best to treat these two classification systems as the separate 
independent systems they are...

I hope this helps y'all, sorry for a late reply... 


Respectfully,


David W. S. Blackwell, II, PE, CFPE, CFI I
Chief Engineer
Office of State Fire Marshal
SC Department of Labor, Licensing, & Regulation, 141 Monticello Trail, 
Columbia, SC 29203
Telephone: 803.896.9800 [Office] 803.896.9833 [Direct]
Fax: 803.896.9806 [Office]
Email:   [email protected]
Website:  http://www.scfiremarshal.llronline.com/


Please note that you can sign up to receive automatic information on SC 
Division of Fire and Life Safety current events, policies, laws and procedures 
by visiting our Web site at:  http://www.scfiremarshal.llronline.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Brad Casterline
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

There is not a complete disconnect between IBC and NFPA 13 Occupancy 
Classifications for required density- the connection is along the lines
of--- if NFPA Classification is based partly on Quantity of the combustibles 
and IBC looks at Use of the space and says we expect 5 lbs fuel/sq.ft at x btu 
blah blah blah so the Fire resistance of the space is yada yada yada...., 
making it a so and so Occupancy, then----make sense? I have been trying for a 
few years to relate density to quantity, combustibility and HRR.

Brad

 
-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

Occupancy doesn't relate to design density but it does determine whether 
sprinklers are required.  B occupancy under most conditions does not require 
sprinklers per code.  But this is a different conversation.......

Craig L. Prahl
Fire Protection Group Lead
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29303
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Cahill, Christopher
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 9:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

How is IBC occupancy classifications relevant to the question of sprinkler
density? There is no correlation IMHO.  That's like saying we ignore 5,000
sq.ft. of rack storage of the plastic packaging where it's in the 100,000
sq.ft. metal widget factory.  Protect the hazard not the occupancy
classification out of a document that is irrelevant to sprinkler design.
Ask the question in an exiting forum and now I'm with you.

To the question, I could go either way.  Though strong lean to OHII because
it may not be a salon for long. Then what is the owner going to do when a
real mercantile comes in.  I haven't been to one in a while.  Aren't there
still aerosols? How about the stock room, assuming they have one?  If it's
truly light amounts of products and the owner understands limitations I
could go along with LH. 

Chris Cahill, PE*
Associate Fire Protection Engineer 
Burns & McDonnell
Phone:  952.656.3652
Fax:  952.229.2923
[email protected]
www.burnsmcd.com
*Registered in: MN


Proud to be #14 on FORTUNE's 2014 List of 100 Best Companies to Work For

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of John Drucker
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

Adding to Bobs cite;

IBC 508.2 Accessory Occupancies 

John Drucker
Assistant Construction Official
Fire Protection Subcode Official
Building/Fire/Electrical Inspector
Borough of Red Bank, NJ
90 Monmouth Street
Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
Cel/Text: 732-904-6823
Email: [email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Bob Holland
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

IBC Section 304, Business Group B, lists 'barber and beauty shops' .

ROBERT HOLLAND Jr. AIA, CDT, LEED AP, PMP ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS / INTERIOR
DESIGNERS
7400 West Campus Rd.   Suite 150   New Albany, OH  43054
www.shremshock.com
t 614 545 4550 x 286     f 614 545 4555     [email protected]

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of John Drucker
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 11:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Beauty Salon/Day Spa

Its most likely a B Use, 10% of which may be considered accessory. Code
cites to follow.

John Drucker - Mobile Email
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cell/Text 732-904-6823


"rongreenman ." <[email protected]> wrote:

Is it stand alone or in a strip mall.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Tim Stone <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just check with the AHJ.
>
> Regards,
> G. Tim Stone
>
> G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
> NICET Level III Engineering Technician Fire Protection Sprinkler 
> Design and Consulting Services
>
>                 117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452
> CELL: (802) 373-0638   TEL: (802) 434-2968   Fax: (802) 434-4343
>                            [email protected]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Todd - Work
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 3:52 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Beauty Salon/Day Spa
>
> Tim, If there was a dedicated retail section, I would agree with you.
> However, having a few bottles of shampoo and body oil on a shelf in a 
> room that otherwise looks more like an office I have a hard time 
> justifying as mercantile.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Mar 5, 2015, at 3:36 PM, Tim Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Todd,
> > Usually they sell product too. Mercantile.
> >
> > Regards,
> > G. Tim Stone
> >
> > G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
> > NICET Level III Engineering Technician Fire Protection Sprinkler 
> > Design and Consulting Services
> >
> >                 117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452
> > CELL: (802) 373-0638   TEL: (802) 434-2968   Fax: (802) 434-4343
> >                            [email protected]
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sprinklerforum
> > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of Todd - Work
> > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 3:32 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Beauty Salon/Day Spa
> >
> > Light or Ordinary Hazard. I'm thinking Light because the hazard 
> > can't be much worse than a hospital, but I may be missing something.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > kl
> > er.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > kl
> > er.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
>



--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon,
essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)

A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering,
inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to