The example notice for OdBL contents is “Contains information from DATABASE NAME, which is made available here under the Open Database License (ODbL).” This will always be acceptable as it is explicitly stated as meeting the requirements of 4.3. I can’t see any legal justification in the ODbL for allowing a mark or the example notice, but not something between.
Have you passed any of these ideas by other publishers of ODbL data or the ODC lists? From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 5:40 AM To: Talk Subject: [OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark (was: contributor mark) 4. The mark is an alternative to "© OpenStreetMap Contributors". Only where the mark can't be used, "© OpenStreetMap Contributors" may be used.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
