Btw, "/indexable/searchable text" tradeoff ... is OpenStreetMap in javascript
written attribution actually indexed? If it is, wouldn't alt text work just as
well, removing the notion of trade off?
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
>________________________________
> From: Kathleen Danielson <kathleen.daniel...@gmail.com>
>To: Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com>
>Cc: Talk <talk@openstreetmap.org>
>Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 12:13 PM
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark (was: contributor
>mark)
>
>
>
>Paul, that sounds like a fair point, if I'm understanding correctly. Alex,
>would it be fair to say that this is more of a recommended alternative, for
>all the reasons we've stated?
>
>
>Richard, can you explain a little more of why you think that the idea is bad
>for OSM? The trade off that I am seeing here is reducing the
>readable/indexable/searchable text in exchange for the beginnings of a visual
>identifier, and a direct link to a strategic copyright page.
>
>
>With regards to rebranding, I couldn't agree more that it's no small task.
>However, I'm not sure why we would lose customer goodwill. While the two are
>certainly linked, it might not be a bad idea for us to start another thread on
>the topic of an overall OSM rebranding, just so that we don't derail this
>discussion here.
>
>
>Loving all of this input, everyone!
>
>
>
>On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>The example notice for OdBL contents is “Contains information from DATABASE
>NAME, which is made available here under the Open Database License (ODbL).”
>This will always be acceptable as it is explicitly stated as meeting the
>requirements of 4.3. I can’t see any legal justification in the ODbL for
>allowing a mark or the example notice, but not something between.
>>
>>Have you passed any of these ideas by other publishers of ODbL data or the
>>ODC lists?
>>
>>From:Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com]
>>Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 5:40 AM
>>To: Talk
>>Subject: [OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark (was: contributor mark)
>>
>>4. The mark is an alternative to "© OpenStreetMap Contributors". Only where
>>the mark can't be used, "© OpenStreetMap Contributors" may be used.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>talk mailing list
>>talk@openstreetmap.org
>>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk@openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
