Edited in Forum On Saturday, 24 October 2020 17:22:26 UTC+11, TonyM wrote: > > My Response [edited] > > On Saturday, 24 October 2020 13:46:22 UTC+11, PMario wrote: >> >> On Saturday, October 24, 2020 at 12:46:49 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote: >>> >>> Mario, >>> Inline syntax defaults to a SPAN. The inline wikitext syntax doesn't >>> care about linebreaks. >>> >> >> So it can /° start in the middle of the line, >> and *end* at the start of the line >> °/ it will create a span and show all the text in 1 line by default. >> >> > Agreed, In fact sometimes that what we want to do. Take an inline slab and > treat it differently even if it contains line breaks eg a Quote however > more often and not we choose either; > > 1. Mark-up with a line scope > 2. Mark-up with a paragraph scope > 3. Mark-up with a block scope > 4. And /°mark-up/° inline. > > Perhaps we can call these 4 "customised pragma forms". > > > This is where I think we should choose 4 glyphs set up for these default > "treatments" although their whole meaning can be redefined, this will be > their default behaviours. So If I scan your customised wiki text, I can > possibly guess the usage of custom mark-up, I have not yet looked at the > definition of. > > I don't know yet, but one glyph should be unencumbered with any defaults. > And perhaps others may be used for html/buttons/macros by default. I just > do not know enough about all the possibilities, and a way to categorise > them yet, perhaps only with usage will we determine which glyph is best at > representing which kind of customise (intuitively). When we know this we > would find it easy to determine how many glyphs we need to provision, what > general usage categories they fit in, and appropriate glyphs to represent > each category. This is a bit of a "putting the cart before the horse > problem". > > This is all about a de facto standard that can easily be broken in fact is > some cases that may be exactly what you want to do. While writing consider > it a code block, when finished use half line spaced paragraphs with justify > and the first word highlighted. Just by redefining the pragma once. ; Reuse > the same glyph, away from its de facto standard. > > I must say it is hard for me to remember which glyph, has which default > behaviour in the current setup. > > One that comes to mind is a simple way to mark text as a comment and > toggle its visibility, through either customising or some other state. > Comments may be of the 4 "customised pragma forms". above. > > Regards > Tony >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/30eb7adc-49a0-4ec4-80fd-1e76ff585af0o%40googlegroups.com.
