> -----Original Message----- > From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hubert Kario > Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 4:14 PM > To: tls@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? > > On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 14:19:33 CEST Dave Garrett wrote: > > * Keep the version ID as { 3, 4 } (already weird counting; changing > > risks more intolerance) > > IMNSHO this alone is enough of a reason not to do this > > it's enough explaining to people that SSLv3.3 is really TLSv1.2, now we'll > have > SSLv3.4 == TLSv1.3 == TLSv2.0
I don't think this is a problem. People will forget "TLS 1.3" and will only remember "TLS 2.0" after some time. Just like few people still remember "Windows 9" today, even if "Windows 9" had been rumored in the news every day before Microsoft officially announced "Windows 10". Also this spec hasn't reached WGLC, so I don't think it's too late to make a change to its name. Xiaoyin _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
