On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 22:20:45 CEST Xiaoyin Liu wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hubert Kario > > Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 4:14 PM > > To: tls@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0? > > > > On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 14:19:33 CEST Dave Garrett wrote: > > > > > * Keep the version ID as { 3, 4 } (already weird counting; changing > > > risks more intolerance) > > > > > > IMNSHO this alone is enough of a reason not to do this > > > > it's enough explaining to people that SSLv3.3 is really TLSv1.2, now we'll > > have SSLv3.4 == TLSv1.3 == TLSv2.0 > > > I don't think this is a problem. People will forget "TLS 1.3" and will only > remember "TLS 2.0" after some time.
well, that's not the experience of our support engineers, people still confuse SSLv3 with TLSv<any> if the WG really wants a TLSvX.0 name, the X really should be bigger than 3 -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
