I promise you, we will never tell you to go away. We will always tell you to go here and provide the pull request to solve your problem: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pulls
Gj On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 3:16 PM Tom Arilla <tmaril...@gmail.com> wrote: > Look Neil, one person called it "the most viewed IntelliJ issue", you > called it "essential to *whom*?!", very well, but it is just few lines of > easy code, practically zero maintenance. > > This behaviour is intentional. I am sorry you hate it but there are users who > love it. There is no plan to change it. > > Essential to *whom*?! Doesn't look like that many users were that bothered! > > Do you see any similarities? Can you show me one case of such an attitude > of IntelliJ devs towards their users? > > And why it matters? Because one day, I may find some other behavior in > Netbeans which me (and a lot of others) find troublesome, and which can be > corrected with few lines of easy code and an option hidden in some > registry, practically zero maintenance. But we we may just be told to go > away, because "I am sorry, go away". > > Why should I risk it? > > > > > Le mar. 16 oct. 2018 à 14:01, Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> a > écrit : > >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 12:05, Tom Arilla <tmaril...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Thank you for the information, but the thread started because of an >> essential bug ignored for many years >> >> Essential to *whom*?! Doesn't look like that many users were that >> bothered! >> >> > By the way, didn't you make a whole database of open bugs obsolete, >> with no migration attempts? >> >> Actually, that's not true. There was a conscious decision not to >> migrate everything in it. But the old bug tracker is still there, and >> in the last web chat we discussed maintaining a read-only clone of it >> on Apache infrastructure. Which I hope will happen, although it >> remains to be seen if the content in it flags any concerns for Oracle. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Neil >> >
