In reply to  John Berry's message of Fri, 2 Nov 2007 11:31:02 +1300:
Hi,
[snip]
>I think that the problems are of a psychological nature, it's protection
>against pain. Easier to attack (and be happy if mistaken) than experience
>the pain of a failed energy revolution.
>
>On 11/2/07, Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:40:25 -0700:
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>> >Geeze... get real. Are you so out to lunch on petty details that you
>> >cannot see the forest for the trees? He does not owe you a detailed
>> >accounting of how he eliminated these issues -
>> [snip]
>> He does if he wishes to be convincing.
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk
I was simply pointing out that if one wishes to convince someone of something,
then one has to play be their rules, not one's own (otherwise they won't be
convinced).
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

The shrub is a plant.

Reply via email to