Jed please, for prcision sake, allow me to make a small correction to one
of you sentences. You forgot only 2 words

*If this is an elaborate scam, they are creating maximum props for it. *They
said* they have:
 * ....
 * ....
and so on.
*

2011/12/21 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>

> Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> But I agree with you all this doesn't prove that they will.
>> It just shows that if they are creating an elaborate scam they take at
>> least care to have some minimal props for it.
>>
>
> If this is an elaborate scam, they are creating maximum props for it. They
> have:
>
> * Established a large, state-of-the-art research laboratory with millions
> of dollars in equipment.
>
> * Hired many highly qualified professional scientists. They persuaded
> these scientists to go along with the hoax and pretend to be doing research.
>
> * Hired a large number of experienced business managers and persuaded them
> to go along with the hoax.
>
> * Built many fake prototype reactors.
>
> * Modified instruments to give false readings.
>
> * Produce large amounts of coherent fake data.
>
> * Invited experts to see this for days at a time and managed to fool them.
> This alone would be an astounding accomplishment. I doubt anyone is capable
> of it.
>
> I think this scenario is highly improbable.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to