On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How do you know these are extravagant claims? > The claims are extravagant, whether true or not. Why else is everyone so excited about them? > If these claims were true then they were not bluster. We don't know yet. > I would say claims without evidence are bluster. When they add evidence, they become something more. > If you do not have inside information, then you are making unfounded > assertions about a company you know nothing about. > It is not unfounded to say they are making claims without evidence. And such claims are justifiably called bluster. Such assertions are not welcome here. > Maybe some people welcome them. You only know that you don't.
