Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote:

> Again, in Rossi's case, there is no evidence at all that his device can be
> made to work at useful energy levels ... except the evidence which comes
> from Rossi himself.
>

I guess there is no evidence if you cover your eyes and your ears and yell
"nya, nya, I can't hear you!!" like a 5-year-old.

There is plenty of evidence if you look up Ni-H experiments at
LENR-CANR.org. There is a *mountain* of evidence if you look up Pd and Ti
as well. I am assuming nature is unified and the phenomenon is
fundamentally the same in all metal hydrides. "The conservation of
miracles" as Mike calls it. What a great name!

I do not know why the heck anyone feels that a watt level reaction in the
laboratory is not supporting evidence for a reaction with the same
characteristics at the kilowatt level with 1000 times more material. Of all
the various skeptical arguments I've heard this one is among the most
untenable. Have you never read anything about the history of science and
technology?!? Have you never heard of "scaling up." The whole point of cold
fusion research from day one has been to scale up to a commercially useful
level of heat.

- Jed

Reply via email to