Yesterday, Robin mentioned that under the theory of Mills, the hydrino
cannot be easily contained after it gives up significant energy - and would
eventually migrate out of the structure like a neutron (being subject to
gravity) and eventually “disappear” anyway – so there is no need for another
sudden kind of “disappearance” where mass/energy is completely removed from
the observer’s reality, resulting in cooling. 

Presumably the spent hydrino (from heating) would migrate to the center of
earth, due to its effective density and neutrality, and thus it is almost
completely removed from the observer’s reality as well. The point of
difference being the net loss (or gain) which was seen at the original
source of the reaction. 

I had the thought that the two routes to hydrogen disappearance, if they are
ever proved - could be connected via some kind of CoE linkage. A ‘cosmic
balance sheet’ of sorts. That would involve “reciprocal space” having its
own gravity link. Maybe the hot and cold particles, both formerly hydrogen
atoms, complete the cycle in the earth’s gravity well. 

There has always been talk of a very dense core for earth, denser than any
element – in fact similar to the so-called neutron star. Neutron stars
contain the densest matter that is directly observable, but it is probably
not neutrons per se – more like “quark soup”. Earth may have a few teaspoons
of quark soup material at the very center, a few gigatons where everything
dense goes to get “regauged” according to Bearden, or “regrooved” according
to Firesign.

… don’t crush that dwarf :-)  


                From: Eric Walker 

                David Roberson wrote:
                
                Thanks for the update Jones.  If the cooling effect is valid
then it should be pursued.  Any time an anomalous occurrence is registered
an opportunity to discover a new relationship exists which may allow us to
fit additional parts of the puzzle into place.
                
                Agreed.  The cooling effect is very interesting.  It brings
the question of conservation of energy to the fore.  If normal LENR is like
a box with a button on it, which once pressed causes heat to spill out, can
you have another box with a button that, when pressed, causes cooling to
occur?  At face value, it sounds like some basic principle is being
violated.  The secret here might be in the materials, where nickel is used
for heating and titanium is used for cooling.  In the process peaks in the
energy potential of the environment are gradually smoothed out and move
towards some kind of baseline.
                
                If you had large LENR power stations operating over decades
and centuries, pumping heat into the environment, would this just result in
a change in the equilibrium of the environment such that more incoming solar
energy would then be reflected into space, or would there be a need for
active cooling of some kind?
                
                Eric
                

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to