I posted the earthquake chart on my blog:

http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/02/15/expanded-quantum-capabilities/

and I posted my statistics a month ago.

http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/12/26/boom-bang-shake-quake/

I also believe p-Values are only a tool and do not identify cause, they
just imply a relationship, which I was seeing visually.

Oklahoma City is Home to the National Weather Research Center and along
with the air force base has ~ 9 overlapping microwave radars within a
50-100 mile radius (range on dopplers is approx. 150 miles)

I have developed a very bad feeling a microwave radars over the past 6
months, especially when 3 or 4 are overlapped.

Stewart




On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:25 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas, Kansas
>
> The area of North Texas, Oklahoma, So. Kansas and Western Arkansas has had
> >3000 seismic events which jumped in 2009
>
> Fracking has been going on for years and there does not seem to be a
> direct link but it may have some impact
>
>
> http://www.examiner.com/article/oklahoma-s-4-yr-long-quake-swarm-is-not-normal-and-it-ain-t-freakin-fracking
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>>  What three states?
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm thinking there could another factor not in evidence ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ChemE Stewart
>>
>>
>>
>> Any open minded guys here have any thoughts/ideas/theories on how the
>> installation of a Doppler microwave weather radar with the following specs
>> might trigger a ten-fold increase in seismic events/sonic booms within a 50
>> mile radius of the tower for the past 3 years compared to the previous 10?
>> My p-Value stats over two years data says there is a correlation (which
>> does not prove causation) - I looked at 3 states of seismic data and approx
>> 30 radar locations
>>
>>
>>
>> ·         Operating frequency: 5510 MHz (C-band)
>>
>> o    Wavelength: 5.44 cm
>>
>> o    Pulse Length: 0.4, 0.8, 1.0, 2.0 µs
>>
>> o    Pulse Repetition Frequency: 300-2000 Hz, 1 Hz step
>>
>> ·         *1 MW Peak Power (magnetron with solid-state modulator) *
>>
>> ·         8.5-meter Andrew precision C-band dish
>>
>> o    High angular resolution: 0.45 degrees @ -3 dB points
>>
>> o    Gain: 50 dBi
>>
>> o    Sidelobe Level: Better than -26 dB one-way
>>
>> o    Cross-Pol: Better than -30 dB
>>
>> ·         Rotation rate: 6-25 deg/s under typical scanning (30 deg/s max)
>>
>> ·         Minimum Detectable Signal: -112 dBm
>>
>> o    Radar Sensitivity: -15 dBZ at 50 km
>>
>> o    Noise Figure: 3 dB
>>
>> ·         Simultaneous dual-polarization
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Nigel Dyer <l...@thedyers.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> I also think it may be relevant to certain classes of LENR, particularly
>> the Graneau/Papp systems.   Even low voltage systems may see localised very
>> high voltage differences as a result of back-emf effects when currents are
>> flowing between two surfaces that are initially in contact and are then
>> separated.
>> Nigel
>>
>> On 15/02/2014 21:54, Eric Walker wrote:
>>
>>   On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:53 AM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> This effect is not very significant in chaotic plasmas, such as in a
>> Farnworth fusor device since there is too much field cancellation due to
>> random motion.  It can be very large for plasma arc filaments, though.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is this a confirmed effect, or one that has been hypothesized?
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm reminded of my drawing of what I think might be going on in LENR,
>> where such an effect might be relevant:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/PoRGR7G.png
>>
>>
>>
>> (Also relevant in this model would be the accumulation of charge at the
>> left hand side, due to the blocking of the protons once they get to the
>> recess in the surface of the metal grain.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to