Axil, I am sure you are right. QM is important. Nano technology is important. However, it does not make old knowledge obsolete.In addition there is need for all sorts of players in order to get LENR to the market. I do not dis your opinions - I am sure they have great merits but they require to be tied to 'old' knowledge and experience and they require to be taken to the market for funding and for consumption, no QM in the world will handle that part of the road.
I am glad I did not take out my gas tank first time I heard a LENR product was market ready. My shoes would have been worn out.:) I think you should stick to your story. However, I am certain that when LENR arrives in all our homes the political outfall will be different than you predict. Many other factors will interact and LENR's deployment is at least 10 years in the future, as I see it. Instead of worrying about what others do we should concentrate to be first in deployment. Together with Europe we have the best infrastructure to deploy LENR. However, less developed countries will close behind, see cellphones. I had my first cellphone in 1972 and I will suggest that deployment in the western world took 25 years and 30 years in the rest of the world. Maybe LENR will be faster but the margin will be similar and that is the advantage we can benefit from. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 "Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort." PJM On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/01/defkalion-announces-timetable-for-2014/ > > > > Defkalion Announces Timetable for 2014 > > > > "Accordingly we expect the commercialization of our technologies (VERSION > 6 OF THE REACTOR) in the 3rd quarter of 2014. For further inquiries please > contact us through our offices" > > > > You can expect some delays, and some interesting demos. > > > > If DGT releases, Rossi will need to release to stay in the game unless his > product is strictly military and classified. It might be. > > > > DGT must press the marketplace to show their cards or be left behind. > > > > On the other hand, DGT will stay small for as long as possible. Who wants > Putin and the Ayatollah breathing down your back or even worse. > > > > My belief is that DGT will begin deployment in Greece, but it is up to > their EOM partners. > > > > There may be many roads to LENR with each defined by a unique engineering > approach. It will take some time for a true consensus to develop about the > underlying science involved, > > > > Personally, I have my story and I am sticking to it. > > > > *Understanding of Chemistry or Nuclear Physics is not that important. > Quantum mechanics and nano-technology and like fields is central to > understanding LENR processes. This is the science of the 21st century. > Scientists rooted in the 20th century need to up their game.* > > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com>wrote: > >> Axil, >> I agree it will be harder to sell petroleum products IF we have a >> commercial LENR product. However, I am still waiting for that to be true. >> Is it near? In my opinion there are too much concern about* who* has the >> right theory instead of *what* is the right theory. I am saying that as >> an unqualified contributor to the theories. Isn't this (deploy LENR) to >> divide the skin before having killed the bear. >> >> To reach the deployment date of LENR I do think this group is important. >> However, I think it is a pity we lost Ed Storms viewpoint. I think we >> should encourage everybody to participate. BLP and their different approach >> as well. The reason they (Ed and BLP and others) do not participate might >> be that they have to 'thin skin' or they feel no acceptance of their ideas >> and therefore avoid the confrontation ("It will anyhow not be taken >> seriously".). I think that as long as their is no hard evidence that one >> approach is producing the expected result we should welcome all different >> opinions. Even input from people like me with no deep understanding of >> Chemistry or Nuclear Physics should be encouraged. There is a competence in >> incompetence also. The competence to ask questions that open the minds of >> more sophisticated scientists. My suggestion would be to at least persuade >> Ed Storms to return. >> >> Do we know how advanced the Russians are when it comes to LENR >> development? Western world might have to buy LENR from Russia? >> >> The other side is that I think Russia is just regrouping to their >> traditional isolationism. I think LENR will have very little impact on >> Russian politics. >> Remember their has been an attempt every hundred years or so to take over >> Russia. Sweden ~1709, France ~1812-13, Germany ~1943. Because of their is a >> strong nationalistic opinion that did not succeed. That is how Putin can >> take over Crimea without violence but against western preferences. If Putin >> is smart he stops here. He would certainly have a totally different >> experience trying to take control in the Baltic states. >> >> Best Regards , >> Lennart Thornros >> >> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com >> lenn...@thornros.com >> +1 916 436 1899 >> 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 >> >> "Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a >> commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort." PJM >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:32 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: >> >>> I hope they do not resort to covert activity to prevent the deployment. >>> This should not be initiated unless LENR devices begin to show up in >>> large numbers. I suspect that the window will be relatively small and may >>> not have any serious impact. >>> >>> After all, how much more effective can those guys be than the >>> international physics establishment? The oil companies and other current >>> energy suppliers may become more important adversaries in the long run. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 11:18 pm >>> Subject: [Vo]:The prospects for LENR deployment >>> >>> There seems to be a confluence of events that provide LENR with an >>> unprecedented opportunity to gain wide acceptance and deployment. >>> >>> Just as war simulated the initial development of nuclear energy, a new >>> commercial and cold war between Russia and the West will stimulate the >>> rapid deployment of the NiH reactor. >>> >>> In the upcoming few years, LENR will be used by western governments as >>> an economic weapon to weaken the Russian economy and reduce the foreign and >>> domestic prerogatives of Putin. >>> >>> This is an ideal opportunity for the first release of the NiH reactor >>> in Europe as a replacement for Russian natural gas, the primary economic >>> weapon to undermine power projection of both the Russian and Iranian >>> governments. >>> >>> LENR will take the energy weapon out of the hands of those who most >>> want to use it. >>> >>> We can expect a fast tracking of the deployment of the NiH reactor in >>> Eastern Europe where Russia has economic leverage through supply of natural >>> gas to these former soviet states. >>> >>> What will Russia and Iran do to counter this attack on their >>> projection of power, their national ambitions, their standard of living, >>> and their international prestige? >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
