> I am sure your statements has merit. I am not able to determine how > accurate you are. >
The chances are better than even that this will be determined by the end of this year. > I do know that it requires that one utilise old experience and new found > techniques and all other resources to reach the final stage. > The technical challenges are easy compared to the political ones. There are no old experiences that can guide the development of LENR. It is unprecedented and world changing. > > If this product holds what it promises. It is to late for anyone to keep > it away from a commercialization. > You underestimate the power of the military industrial complex and the desire for security and military supremacy in the US. > For all of us depending on the US government it would be beneficial if the > US participated and did not let the opportunity to be a dominant factor. > Judging from the cellphone development it might happen. > Cellphones are but a toy compared to the impact of LENR to the world order. > > First to market will not mean much from economical or impact point of > view. > Competition, greed, and fear are what push the affairs of men in these modern times. > A good concept with enough backing of capital, management and marketing > will be key-factors once the technical issues are understood - parallel > with optimal > You did not mention national security, classification, regulation, the Kock brothers. and the nuclear regulatory agency (NRC ) as factors in this upcoming turn of events..
