Axil, No I have not read those articles. A brief look told me that I have had some of the information in other forums. I will look through the entire set of documents later this week. I appreciate the articles, they certainly have value. In addition the articles will improve my knowledge - so Thank You. I appreciate your dedication to the issue. My point is that we need more than one philosophy in order to sort out how LENR will be explained. You are actually using old time knowledge to support your theory and I think that is required. Tesla had his moments but he also managed to leave a lot of holes in the documentation I think. Do not blame the government. Tesla could have secured that information found its way to 'the people'. Papp, Moray et al. they are either very smart but useless in leaving behind a theory documented so later generations could benefit or they were scam artists. I do not know and I am not accusing either one. However, there are mystical stories involved and that would not need to be. It has been relatively easy to communicate since Gutenberg. There is a say what is poorly communicated is based on a weak thought. I think many of the people referred to failed in communication and there is no excuse for that. Was it because of a illogical idea ? As we talk about the deployment one need to engage other disciplines also. I am not looking for a job as I am too old to engage in a venture of this magnitude. However, people with entrepreneurial skills and understanding of marketing and finance are key to get deployment. If you think that will be automatic as the physical scientists find the answer you have to stop and think again. Mr. Tesla is a good example. I know that many people say that he was misunderstood and that J.P. Morgan is accused of stopping his ideas as he saw no way to profit from his endless free electricity. If it was so, then Tesla's mistake was to not seek support from people with the financial knowledge. You can blame JPM but he looked after his interest - good or bad - Tesla failed because he concentrated on the thing he knew. He did not fail because JPM did not do what Tesla thought right. There is a need to take responsibility for one's own mistakes. Keep up looking for the answer but listen to others and engage specialists when need be and not too late is my advice.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 "Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort." PJM On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Have you read this? > > Fusion by Pseudo-Particles > > > > Part 1 > > > > http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf > > > > Part 2 > > > > http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf > > > > Part 3 > > > > http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf > > > This is the story of how many times that LENR has been discovered and lost > since the time of Tesla. I will try my best to make sure that this loss > does not happen again. > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Lennart Thornros > <lenn...@thornros.com>wrote: > >> AXIL, >> Nobody would be unhappy if we have a LENR product this. year. However >> deployment is several years out. Ido hope you are right. >> We do agree that the poligical issues are bigger and I say their is a >> need for other economical, organizational issues you do not want to see. >> I do not underestimate the power of the establishment. They are >> sidestepped bythe long and not agreed to existence of LENR for 25 years >> are here playing in the hands of normal people. >> I do not compare cellphones to LENR. Cell phones is just a modern >> technology being implemented. So from implementation point ofviw they have >> similarities. Draw from old experiences. >> Yes Axil greed is here you did not know but it has been here for some >> time now:) >> Yeah there is people trying to do harm. Sorry in the long run they do not >> count. >> Good luck solving the theory. I will go to sweden (if alife) to see you >> accept the Nobel price:) >> On Mar 26, 2014 5:27 PM, "Axil Axil" <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> I am sure your statements has merit. I am not able to determine how >>>> accurate you are. >>>> >>> >>> The chances are better than even that this will be determined by the end >>> of this year. >>> >>> >>> >>>> I do know that it requires that one utilise old experience and new >>>> found techniques and all other resources to reach the final stage. >>>> >>> >>> The technical challenges are easy compared to the political ones. There >>> are no old experiences that can guide the development of LENR. It is >>> unprecedented and world changing. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> If this product holds what it promises. It is to late for anyone to >>>> keep it away from a commercialization. >>>> >>> >>> You underestimate the power of the military industrial complex and the >>> desire for security and military supremacy in the US. >>> >>> >>>> For all of us depending on the US government it would be beneficial if >>>> the US participated and did not let the opportunity to be a dominant >>>> factor. Judging from the cellphone development it might happen. >>>> >>> >>> Cellphones are but a toy compared to the impact of LENR to the world >>> order. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> First to market will not mean much from economical or impact point of >>>> view. >>>> >>> >>> Competition, greed, and fear are what push the affairs of men in these >>> modern times. >>> >>> >>>> A good concept with enough backing of capital, management and marketing >>>> will be key-factors once the technical issues are understood - parallel >>>> with optimal >>>> >>> >>> You did not mention national security, classification, regulation, the >>> Kock brothers. and the nuclear regulatory agency (NRC ) as factors in this >>> upcoming turn of events.. >>> >>> >> >
