Have you read this? Fusion by Pseudo-Particles
Part 1 http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf Part 2 http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf Part 3 http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf This is the story of how many times that LENR has been discovered and lost since the time of Tesla. I will try my best to make sure that this loss does not happen again. On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com>wrote: > AXIL, > Nobody would be unhappy if we have a LENR product this. year. However > deployment is several years out. Ido hope you are right. > We do agree that the poligical issues are bigger and I say their is a need > for other economical, organizational issues you do not want to see. > I do not underestimate the power of the establishment. They are > sidestepped bythe long and not agreed to existence of LENR for 25 years > are here playing in the hands of normal people. > I do not compare cellphones to LENR. Cell phones is just a modern > technology being implemented. So from implementation point ofviw they have > similarities. Draw from old experiences. > Yes Axil greed is here you did not know but it has been here for some > time now:) > Yeah there is people trying to do harm. Sorry in the long run they do not > count. > Good luck solving the theory. I will go to sweden (if alife) to see you > accept the Nobel price:) > On Mar 26, 2014 5:27 PM, "Axil Axil" <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>> I am sure your statements has merit. I am not able to determine how >>> accurate you are. >>> >> >> The chances are better than even that this will be determined by the end >> of this year. >> >> >> >>> I do know that it requires that one utilise old experience and new found >>> techniques and all other resources to reach the final stage. >>> >> >> The technical challenges are easy compared to the political ones. There >> are no old experiences that can guide the development of LENR. It is >> unprecedented and world changing. >> >> >>> >>> If this product holds what it promises. It is to late for anyone to >>> keep it away from a commercialization. >>> >> >> You underestimate the power of the military industrial complex and the >> desire for security and military supremacy in the US. >> >> >>> For all of us depending on the US government it would be beneficial if >>> the US participated and did not let the opportunity to be a dominant >>> factor. Judging from the cellphone development it might happen. >>> >> >> Cellphones are but a toy compared to the impact of LENR to the world >> order. >> >> >>> >>> First to market will not mean much from economical or impact point of >>> view. >>> >> >> Competition, greed, and fear are what push the affairs of men in these >> modern times. >> >> >>> A good concept with enough backing of capital, management and marketing >>> will be key-factors once the technical issues are understood - parallel >>> with optimal >>> >> >> You did not mention national security, classification, regulation, the >> Kock brothers. and the nuclear regulatory agency (NRC ) as factors in this >> upcoming turn of events.. >> >> >
