On Saturday, 23 September 2006 at 19:46, Dennis Schridde wrote: > Am Samstag, 23. September 2006 17:44 schrieb Christian Ohm: > > On Saturday, 23 September 2006 at 13:02, Dennis Schridde wrote: > > > Am Samstag, 23. September 2006 12:31 schrieb Christian Ohm: > > > > Now that's actually a good idea (and one I should have had myself...) - > > > > just make it the FSF Europe - ask them about a) what they make of the > > > > readme.txt and b) how to proceed. Should be the best legal advice we > > > > can get for free. > > > > > > Ok, then do that please. > > > > OK, I'll make a draft and then post it here for comments. > If I look at this one: > http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/08/1550257 > > Then it looks very ugly for us. Seems as if the data was intentionally not > put > under the GPL. (According to their interpretation of the situation.)
No, that's just slashdot, take it with a grain of salt. This was two days after the source release; probably someone misinterpreted the readme.txt. According to http://liberatedgames.org/game.php?game_id=74 both source and data are GPL (except for the parts not included). Read the second comment thread (from the poster). -- Evolution is both fact and theory. Creationism is neither. _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
