On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:21:54PM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote: > David Dawes writes: > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 07:05:29PM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote: > > > > >I have just checked the replies on the xfree86@ list. > > >Most of them contain just the [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses. > > > > I can't speak for others, but most of my replies (including this one) > > are like that by design. > > Yes, I know. But this is not the point I was trying to make. > > If Joe Newuser has problems getting XFree86 to run he may send > email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (After all it is advertised all over to > do so), but he doesn't subscribe to the list (It says nowhere that he > should). > One of us wants to anser him, hits 'group reply' and because of the > Reply-To: only containing the list the answer goes only to the list. > But since the original author isn't subscribed he *doesn't* get the > answer.
I believe that if your mailer doesn't either a) include the RT address in a group or b) ask, that your mailer is borken. But, third time now: the Answer Gang has *already fixed this problem*. Why isn't anyone interested? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 OS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows -- Simon Slavin, on a.f.c _______________________________________________ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
