Hi Dain, Geronimo can use everything from Yoko including tools etc. Since geronimo is certified with JDK 1.5 this should not be a problem.
thanks, Adi Sakala > -----Original Message----- > From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:30 PM > To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: coding standard and logging > > > I would hope that everything runs under 1.4. Geronimo will > also want > to use that tooling that you mention. > > -dain > > On Apr 6, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > > I think that we can layer this. Core server compiles and runs > > under JDK14. Tooling, etc. compiles and runs under JDK15. > > > > Let me be clear. The overwhelming bulk of production deployments > > are in JDK14. We need to be sensitive to this. You will need to > > convince me that any other route other than the compromise stated > > above is a viable option. > > > > I do not like retrotranslators since, IIUC, they do not work well > > w/ debuggers. > > > > > > Regards, > > Alan > > > > Sakala, Adinarayana wrote, On 4/6/2006 8:50 AM: > > > >> Yes If we start JDK 1.5 you get all the rich features of JDK 1.5 > >> plus most projects/customers are moving in that direction. > >> For the part that "we will not support JDK 1.4" answer is yes and > >> no depending on how you look at it. > >> Yes, is we can use a retrotranslator to run in a JDK 1.4 > >> environment. http://retrotranslator.sourceforge.net/ > >> > >> My vote would be to start with JDK 1.5 as Aaron suggests in this > >> email. Writing code in JDK1.5 is so much different than writing > >> code in JDK 1.4 and then running it in 1.5. > >> > >> +1 to take the route of JDK 1.5 for Yoko. > >> > >> thanks, > >> Adi > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:34 AM > >>> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: coding standard and logging > >>> > >>> > >>> Nolan, Edell wrote, On 4/6/2006 8:19 AM: > >>> > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 > >>>> April 2006 16:07 > >>>> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>>> Subject: Re: coding standard and logging > >>>> > >>>> Lars Kühne wrote, On 4/5/2006 9:30 PM: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Lars Kühne wrote, On 4/4/2006 4:05 PM: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Nolan, Edell wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2) The last email for the logging - is below We could use > >>>>>>>> the LogUtils class from celtix which is using the > >>>>>>>> jdk1.5 logging. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think there was strong opposition against JDK logging > >>>>>>> because people love log4j. I think the consensus was to > >>>>>>> define our own logger interface and inject that in ORB.init(). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> What are our target JDK versions again? Do we start w/ JDK14 > >>>>>> or JDK13? I am of the opinion that we use the vanilla logger > >>> for JDK14 > >>>>>> or, if we start w/ JDK13, log4j. In either case I do not see > >>>>>> the need for a specialized logger interface that's injected; > >>>>>> I'm interested in hearing opinion on this. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> JDK 1.3 will be end-of-lifed by Sun this summer, so I think > >>> we should > >>>>> ignore it. > >>>>> > >>>>> Re logging, where I work we use log4j on JDK 1.4. I think that > >>>>> is a pretty common scenario, and using vanilla > j.u.logging will > >>>>> not integrate well with the rest of our apps. If you want to > >>> support both > >>>>> you either have to use some logger abstraction, and a > >>> logger interface > >>>>> is the best abstraction I can come up with. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Makes sense. What about slf4j? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Re minimum JDK: I would like to also bring JDK 1.5 into the > >>> picture, > >>>>> but maybe that should go into another thread. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Yes, if our minimum JDK is 1.4 then I assume that we would > >>> work under JDK1.5; er, at least if you don't use Geronimo as an > >>> example. :) > >>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Alan. > >>>> > >>>> I seen on the geronimo dev list > >>>> "We already support JDK 1.5 except for CORBA. Because of > >>> the CORBA limitation Geronimo can't be certified on JDK 1.5, but > >>> if you leave CORBA disabled (and turn off the DayTrader sample > >>> application) Geronimo should run fine on 1.5. > >>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Aaron > >>>> " > >>>> > >>>> My vote is to start with jdk1.5 and it seems geronimo > >>> already has support for jdk1.5. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> When you say start w/ JDK 1.5, do you mean that we will not > >>> support JDK1.4? I am very much against that. > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Alan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >
