Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status

Hi guys, OK, we've now cleared out all the 2.0.7 patches from last week, save one that might still be sitting on Toby's hard drive :) The jira issue for this is at [1]. Would it be possible to not migrate this to Struts2, cause I am not really sure how to make it a plugin (part of the code

Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status

forgotten to mention that the code is already in WebWork svn together with documentation and a showcase example. Details could be found in the jira issue itself. cheers tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, OK, we've now cleared out all the 2.0.7 patches from last week, save one

Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status

Sounds cool Ted, marked as fix for fure. Cheers. Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We could just change the Fix For to future, in case someone wants to try later. Ted. On 3/12/07, tm jee wrote: Hi guys, OK, we've now cleared out all the 2.0.7 patches from last week, save one

Re: [S2] XWork Status Quo

Happy new year guys. :-) WebWork just like any other open-source project follows the open-source spirits. It is very much driven by the community itself. Features are often implemented when they are substantial enough, it doesn't matter if it originated from users, commiters or the project

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

Lmao ;-D Philip Luppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although the train stops in Aachen, I fear I will not join you there, as Rainer and me will go together by car . But I'm sure we find some time place in Antwerp :) Well, you have not that far from aachen to Antwerp. I

Re: [s2] 2.0.2 release this weekend

Hi Rainer, Toby, are you still working on the docs? I think there's some changes needed to be done on the current xwork2 docs, there's the new DI introduced lately and I think the docs doesn't take that into account. I think (I am not sure) that the creation of ActionProxy etc. might be

[s2] BeanSelectionProvider

Hi guys, There's some part I don't understand, would be glad if anyone could help me understand it better. In Dispatcher, during init (in init() method),. BeanSelectionProvider is being added twice to ConfigurationManager, once during loading config from classloader (zero configuration) and

Re: [s2] BeanSelectionProvider

Ok. thx :) Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do an svn update...I just fixed that bug 30 minutes ago :) Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys, There's some part I don't understand, would be glad if anyone could help me understand it better. In Dispatcher, during init (in init() method

Re: [s2] struts-default

sorry for poping this again. Any thoughts on this? :) tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: forgotten some stuff in previous post. xwork-default.xml wouldn't be loaded is we are using Struts2, just that with this approach there's 2 files to maintain whenever we introduce new beans etc. (one

Re: Value Stack Question

Hi Mark, By doing valueStack.getContext(); we get the valueStack's context (a Map) whose value with someKey as its key is accessible through @s.property value=%{#someKey} / There's a root in the value stack as well, valueStack.getRoot(); which is like a stack, I think that's where the

[s2] struts-default

Hi guys, Shouldn't we have the xwork stuff in xwork-default.xml? In struts-default.xml, There's some common beans like bean class=com.opensymphony.xwork2.ObjectFactory name=xwork / bean type=com.opensymphony.xwork2.ObjectFactory name=struts

Re: [s2] struts-default

-default.xml I'm open to changing this if there are other good options on the table. Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys, Shouldn't we have the xwork stuff in xwork-default.xml? In struts-default.xml, There's some common beans like

Re: [s2] struts-default

that are duplicated in struts-default.xml. Thoughts? rgds tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see. What about duplicating those beans in xwork-default.xml, it is still going to be in struts-default.xml as well. Just such that those who use xwork standalone could do // the will load xwork-default.xml

Re: New Struts configuration design

, please readd your fix, but try to find more explicit names for the dispatchers and very clearly document the logic so it is easier to grasp. If you don't have time, I may be able to get to it next week. Thanks, Don tm jee wrote: Could you go into detail why the cleanup filter needs

Re: svn commit: r475123 - /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/org/apache/struts2/default.properties

I see. thx for the info Don. Just removed the comments in default.properties, added / updated javadoc in CompositeActionMapper to reflect this. cheers. Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, that wasn't an accident. The composite mapper now uses a different, simpler mechanism to

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

Hi guys, I think we might need to push back XWork2 release plan a bit. With the new IoC feature in XWork2, the docs gets outdated, might need some time to make it up-todate again. Thoughts? Cheers. Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Mitchell wrote: I'd be happy to take a stab at

Re: [s2][OT] Guice rocks

capabilities. Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys, Sorry, this might be off topic a bit. Just want to say I really like Guice. Its simple, fast (amazing !!!), well written ... I like the code, its so clean and elegant (to me at least). For newbies like me who are still trying to pick up the new features

Re: [s2][OT] Guice rocks

Hi Konstantin, Its at http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/ Enjoy Guice. Its Guice time :-) Cheers. Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- tm jee wrote: Hi guys, Guice doesn't seem to have a mailing list or forum. Does anyone know how to follow up

Re: [s2][OT] Guice rocks

Good idea Alex. ;) I manage to find his email at carzybob.org Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/15/06, tm jee wrote: Hi guys, Guice doesn't seem to have a mailing list or forum. Does anyone know how to follow up with development / news of Guice? It doesn't seem to have

Re: [s2][OT] Guice rocks

to it. Cheers. Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- tm jee wrote: Hi Konstantin, Its at http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/ Enjoy Guice. Its Guice time :-) Not sure whether I will be enjoying it, but I will try to understand why it is better thank pico/nano

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

there. I think we anticipate that both the XWork 2 and Struts 2 distributions will be stuck at beta again this cycle. But, we can't have another Struts 2 beta without another XWork 2 beta. On 11/15/06, tm jee wrote: I think we might need to push back XWork2 release plan a bit. With the new IoC

Re: Alternate Update Example

Hi Mark, Thank you for your interest and efford. I think we could add it into the example section. :-) As the article is about Struts2, I think it would be more appropriate if we have it in Struts2 confluence, what do you think? Unfortunately to access the struts2 confluence, one needs CLA.

[s2] WW-1506

Hi guys, Found a possible bug with Struts2 DI feature. Opened up a jira issue for it (WW-1508). Leaving the issue open for reviews. Don if you got the time to have a look, it would be great. cheers Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Re: [s2] WW-1506

to facilitate easier synchronization with the original project. Could you back out the changes and try the required=false approach? Thanks, Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys, Found a possible bug with Struts2 DI feature. Opened up a jira issue for it (WW-1508). Leaving the issue open for reviews. Don if you

Re: [s2] WW-1506

. Then, we wouldn't need all the changes to xwork and guice. In particular, I'd like to avoid changing the Guice source code if all possible to facilitate easier synchronization with the original project. Could you back out the changes and try the required=false approach? Thanks, Don tm jee

Re: [s2] WW-1506

Hi Don, I've reverted the changes on my local box, and tried out with @Inject(required=false), when starting jetty using mvn jetty:run, it seems to be giving me the following stack Should I commit back the reverted changes. Can't figure out a way to fix this without doing changes to the DI

Re: [s2] WW-1506

Hi guys, I've undo the commit for WW-1506, so the problem will still exists in the latest svn head. Can't seems to figure out a way without doing changes (quite major) to the container /xwork2 api. See jira issue WW-1506 for more info. p/s i might be off for a few days. rgds tm jee [EMAIL

Re: New Struts configuration design

Hi guys, There might be a fix releated to this (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1489) that seems to be broken. WW-1489 abstracted the common logic from both DispatcherFilter and ActionContextCleanUp to an Abstract filter. With the latest commit, FilterDispatcher is put back to its

[s2] Move Ognl code base into Struts2

Hey guys, What do you guys think about moving Ognl code base into Struts2, just like what was did with Guice? rgds - All new Yahoo! Mail The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use. - PC Magazine

Re: [s2] Move Ognl code base into Struts2

felt appropriate? But as Martin pointed out, there's going to be quite a massive responsibility in maintaining ognl docs, patches, user requests etc. So i guess its not really a feasible option right now. Cheers. Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/13/06, tm jee wrote: Hey guys

Re: New Struts configuration design

the dispatcher? Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys, There might be a fix releated to this (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1489) that seems to be broken. WW-1489 abstracted the common logic from both DispatcherFilter and ActionContextCleanUp to an Abstract filter. With the latest commit

Re: Is it possible to configure a request scoped bean of Spring2?

Hi Ruimo, If not mistaken i think we might need this bean . scope=request ... aop:scoped-proxy / ... /bean rgds Ruimo Uno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying Spring2 with Struts2 but cannot configure request scoped bean. I've changed web.xml along with the folowing guide:

Re: Is it possible to configure a request scoped bean of Spring2?

You are welcomed. :) Ruimo Uno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks! It works fine! 2006/11/12, tm jee : Hi Ruimo, If not mistaken i think we might need this ... ... rgds Ruimo Uno wrote: Hi, I'm trying Spring2 with Struts2 but cannot configure request scoped bean. I've

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

Sounds interesing. I guess after this, to use XWork, we could just say, grab a copy ActionProxyFactory from Container, and everything is wired in by Guice. Is there any place where those interested could follow up with this? Maybe a jira issue describing the details about it. Guice is cool,

[s2] struts2-archetype-starter 's struts-master parent

Hi guys, struts2-archetype-starter seems to depends on struts-master version 4-snapshot which doesn't exists at the moment in maven repository (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/). Struts2's core, etc seems to still be using struts-master version 3. Are we suppose to use struts-master version 3

[s2] XWork2 documentation

Hi guys, Got XWork2 documentation filled up. Please do have a look at it if you've got some time to free. Its at http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/XW/XWork2 As usual any feedbacks are welcomed. Cheers rgds Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Re: [s2] struts2-archetype-starter 's struts-master parent

/m2-snapshot-repository/url releasesenabletrue/enable/releases snapshotsenabledtrue/enabled/snapshots /repository /repositories Maybe we should have this in struts2-archetype-starter's pom.xml as well. rgds Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/11/06, tm jee wrote

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

Hi guys, I think there's an issue that might be related to retrotranslator. Its at https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1493 Could this be related? Thoughs Have anyone used the weaved jar file with BEA JRockit? Thx. Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, Rainer. Applying

Re: Struts2 radio UI tag issue.

to Struts2 too? 2006/11/8, tm jee : Yup. That's the reason I think its ok to compare they key, just like the patch (ww-1369) and you suggested. :-) Ruimo Uno wrote: 2006/11/8, tm jee : There's a related jira issue for this as well reported on WebWork. http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW

Re: svn commit: r472338 - in /struts/maven/trunk/struts2-archetype-starter/src/main/resources: META-INF/archetype.xml archetype-resources/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/decorators/main.ftl archetype-resource

Does this need a servlet mapping? I don't think so. It just expose the servlet instance itself such that ServletConfig etc. could be obtained . This I think is needed when using a jsp taglib in freemarker rgds. Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: svn commit: r472338 - in /struts/maven/trunk/struts2-archetype-starter/src/main/resources: META-INF/archetype.xml archetype-resources/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/decorators/main.ftl archetype-resource

Thx for the clarification Craig. :-) Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/8/06, tm jee wrote: Does this need a servlet mapping? I don't think so. It just expose the servlet instance itself such that ServletConfig etc. could be obtained . This I think is needed when

Re: [s2] XWork2 release plan

Okie dokie Rainer. I'll have a go at it, this weekend and comming weekends as well. rgds Rainer Hermanns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Toby, have a look at OS Jira for XWork2... There are some open issues left, mostly regarding the build and release process with maven. I plan to work on these

Re: Struts2 radio UI tag issue.

There's a related jira issue for this as well reported on WebWork. http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW-1369 I don't think there's an issue comparing the key. What do others think about it? But for rendering the page, we should use the string cause freemarker will added locale specific

Re: Struts2 radio UI tag issue.

Yup. That's the reason I think its ok to compare they key, just like the patch (ww-1369) and you suggested. :-) Ruimo Uno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/11/8, tm jee : There's a related jira issue for this as well reported on WebWork. http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW-1369 I don't

Re: Struts2 radio UI tag issue.

Yup, but sometimes the key might be an object or a string, I guess that's the reason toString() was used. I think it should be fixed as Ruimo Uno suggested. rgds Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can force freemarker to render it as a number with ?c I think. musachy tm jee wrote

Re: [s2] Servlet 2.4 for the starter archetype?

Hi guys, I've go ahead make the following changes on struts2-archetype-starter :- - make web.xml 2.4 compatible instead of 2.3 (removed the taglib portion and add the appripriate 2.4 web-app tag) - corrected the unused 'home.html' link The next question is, where are Sitemesh tags used at

Re: Will Struts2 use OGNL as WW did?

Hi Vitor, I think the doActionMethod fallback was removed from webwork. Have a look at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Key+Changes+From+WebWork+2 for more of the changes from webwork to struts2. Or maybe I did something wrong and I'm totally embarassing myself right now. No

Re: Will Struts2 use OGNL as WW did?

Hi guys, I think this option is mentioned before in Struts2 maling list (by Ted if not mistaken). What do you guys think about us forking Ognl? Ognl is just too important to WebWork/Struts2. Thoughts? Good? Bad? rgds Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/6/06, Don Brown wrote:

Re: Will Struts2 use OGNL as WW did?

sounds ok to me. But are we going to take it out in 2.1.x ? I'd prefer not to. rgds Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for restoring do*. Matt On 11/6/06, Don Brown wrote: tm jee wrote: Hi Vitor, I think the do fallback was removed from webwork. Have a look at http

Re: Will Struts2 use OGNL as WW did?

Well, since we have full access to OGNL, why can't we just make the changes we need? Patrick should be able to hook us up :) Sounds cool. For those who are interested, more info about OGNL could be found at http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/ rgds Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tm

Re: ajax tags

with similar results(using patch), I tried with eclipse and it worked like a charm. Shame on me :) tm jee wrote: Hi guys, I've tried to apply Musachy's patch on my local machine and the following is the output. There seems to be some part that failed. Am I patching it wrongly? [EMAIL

Re: ajax tags

-- saving rejects to file core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/views/freemarker/tags/PanelModel.java.rej (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) rgds tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okie dokie. Thx Musachy. :-) Musachy Barroso wrote: I have attached the patch to WW-1484, please note

Re: ajax tags

, DatePicker, TimePicker, DropDownDateTimePicker(kind of a verbose name right? :)) musachy tm jee wrote: Done, 2 jira ticket created http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1484 - upgrading Struts2 dojo widget that might failed due to upgrading dojo to 0.4 http://issues.apache.org/struts

Re: Our continuum instance is back up

and keep careless developer like me to make sure the test case passed and things run smoothly before commiting James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and do the nightly distribution -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 On Nov 1, 2006, at 5:10 AM, James Mitchell wrote:

Re: ajax tags

those bindXs with defineWidget. We are going to need another bug for the actual upgrade from dojo 0.3 to 0.4(0.4 was released today I think). musachy tm jee wrote: I'm using defineWidget, and it is cool. Yup. Is it that the bind, binddiv, bindanchor etc have been written

Re: ajax tags

Hi guys, If its ok with everyone, I'd like to upgrade Struts2 dojo js to 0.4, sometime today or tomorrow. (WW-1845). This will most likely breaks some existing struts2 components. We will patch them up individually (WW-1844) Cheers tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Done, 2 jira ticket created

Re: ajax tags

~ tm jee wrote: Hi guys, If its ok with everyone, I'd like to upgrade Struts2 dojo js to 0.4, sometime today or tomorrow. (WW-1845). This will most likely breaks some existing struts2 components. We will patch them up individually (WW-1844) Cheers tm jee wrote: Done, 2 jira

Re: ajax tags

are ToggleBindDiv.js, DynArchCalendar.js, and TimePicker, I think only TimerPicker is important(I need to add DropDownTimePicker), which I could get done by Wednesday or Thursday. musachy On 10/31/06, tm jee wrote: Hi Ian, Have we cut the 2.0.1 beta yet? I think we have the 2.0.1 release, its

[s2] [Idea] CompositeActionMapper

Hi guys, What do you guys think about having a CompositeActionMapper that allows one of the many ActionMapper it has to being used. 1 +-+ +| ActionMapper | |+-+ |^ || |

[s2][Improvement] ActionContextCleanUp and FilterDispatcher

Hi, Both filter, ActionContextCleanUp and FilterDispatcher contains some similar logic which I think would be more appropriate if we move them to an abstract superclass, maybe called AbstractFilterDispatcher. Some of the logics are - creation of a Dispatcher - populating the created

Re: ajax tags

Hi guys, sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for struts2 dojo widgets. - use dojo.widget.defineWidget instead of the old-way of using dojo.provide, dojo.extends etc. Dojo got most of its widget rewritten using this way. - have struts2 widgets/utils as a

Re: [Proposal] Struts 2 Result Selectors

Hi guys, Is it possible to have something like result-type name=selector class=o.a..d.SelectorResult param name=matcherso.a.s.d.RoleMatcher/param param name=matcherso.a.s.d.AgentMatcher/param param name=wrapso.a.s.d.ServletDispatcherResult/param /result-type so that we don't

Re: ajax tags

, as per Don's comment somewhere on this thread. musachy tm jee wrote: Hi guys, sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for struts2 dojo widgets. - use dojo.widget.defineWidget instead of the old-way of using dojo.provide, dojo.extends etc. Dojo got most

Re: ajax tags

somewhere on this thread. musachy tm jee wrote: Hi guys, sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for struts2 dojo widgets. - use dojo.widget.defineWidget instead of the old-way of using dojo.provide, dojo.extends etc. Dojo got most of its widget rewritten using

Re: ajax tags

, as per Don's comment somewhere on this thread. musachy tm jee wrote: Hi guys, sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for struts2 dojo widgets. - use dojo.widget.defineWidget instead of the old-way of using dojo.provide, dojo.extends etc. Dojo got most

Re: ajax tags

Hi Musachy, Thank you for your interest. I think this mailing list would be fine as it is going to be related to Struts2. Please feel free to share any of your thoughs. Actually, there's no real ownership to Struts2 code, its by the Struts2 community for the Struts2 community as well. If we

Re: [s2] xwork docs

on that wiki, can someone check? -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 On Oct 14, 2006, at 6:40 AM, tm jee wrote: Hi Guys, I've got the xwork2 docs mostly filled up i guess, except for a few more pages. I'll need extra pairs of eyes to help going through them to make sure they are valid. Else i think

Re: JXP Template support?

Hi guys, I've go ahead and created an issue in Struts2 jira. https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1473 rgds Philip Luppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/16/06, Philip Luppens wrote: b) if we can't fix the caching problem in Freemarker. Are we talking about this caching

Re: [S2] Action Injection and ExecuteResult=true

Hi Ted, Shouldn't it be [EMAIL PROTECTED] name=actions.StoryTypeIdList executeResult=true/] or did i miss something. rgds Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we are injecting Action classes via Spring, singleton=false/ should that work when we call an Action from an action tag

Re: [S2] Spring 2 for Struts 2?

I guess everybody knows the reasons ;-). Hmm... let me guess, infoq uses Spring 1.2.x ;-) Me too :-) Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/14/06, Mark Menard wrote: On 10/13/06 5:36 PM, Ted Husted wrote: Since the reports are that Spring 2 works just fine with Struts 2,

Re: [s2] xwork docs

, just drop me a mail, i'd be able to arrange that with Phil or mybe Pat. Cheers. tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thx Don. Thanks again for picking this up! Well, its a challengin task, someone has to pick it up fast before its being occupied ;-) rgds Don Brown wrote: Toby, that looks

Re: [S2] Spring 2 for Struts 2?

Hey I am not so selfish; I was thinking about all those big companies for which an upgrade is taking a lot of time. Yup. I know, I'm just joking :-) Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/14/06, tm jee wrote: I guess everybody knows the reasons ;-). Hmm... let me guess

Re: [s2] xwork docs

that will what the majority of the new users will be familiar with. And honestly, it is pretty hard to go wrong when adding new docs, so feel free to just run with it. Thanks again for picking this up! Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys, Got the outline of xwork2 documentation out at http

[s2] xwork docs

Hi guys, Got the outline of xwork2 documentation out at http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/XW/XWork2 Its based on how the WebWork documentation currently looks like, so users familiar with WebWork docs should be familiar with xwork2 docs hopefully. Any feedbacks are very much welcomed.

Re: [S2] Confluence clear cache snippet plugins code access

I see. thx for the info Pat. Ted, are you busy lately? If so i guess the snippet stuff could wait. rgds Patrick Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Toby, I believe Ted can provide insight here. I gave him access to the plugin source, but I don't know what happened to it since or in what form it

[S2] Confluence clear cache snippet plugins code access

Hi guys, The clear cache feature of cwiki seems to be missing. Does anyone notice this? I've made some changes to the javadoc snippet and wanted to clear the cache such that confluence re-pickup the changes from svn, it seems that the clearCache.action is not being mapped. Recently we

Re: Struts 2.0.1 release

Has anyone volunteered to work on the XWork docs? I could work on XWork2 docs. I think its better if I don't alter the confluence content for xwork directly but prepare the word doc i have in mind maybe in a doc format and maybe commit a copy into xwork2 svn such that others could have a look

Re: Struts plugins

. From a core framework POV, I think simply loading struts-plugin.xml in a non-deterministic order is fine for our needs. Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys, Just some thoughts, maybe we could have an order parameter introduced eg struts-plugin.xml struts param name=order10/param

Re: Abstracting Ognl from XWork and Struts 2?

Its doable I guess. If we have an Expression parser / converter like Alex pointed out, we could have a standard syntax, but it would be more complicated to implement. Without an Expression parser / converter, it'd likely to get users confused as it depends on what implementation is being

Re: Struts plugins

could change it to load struts-default.xml, struts-plugin.xml, struts-plugin-ext.xml, struts.xml or whatever other files you'd like. From a core framework POV, I think simply loading struts-plugin.xml in a non-deterministic order is fine for our needs. Don tm jee wrote: Hi guys

Re: Abstracting Ognl from XWork and Struts 2?

, tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its doable I guess. If we have an Expression parser / converter like Alex pointed out, we could have a standard syntax, but it would be more complicated to implement. Without an Expression parser / converter, it'd likely to get users confused

Re: Struts plugins

Hi guys, Just some thoughts, maybe we could have an order parameter introduced eg struts-plugin.xml struts param name=order10/param package /package /struts So we could have control of which plugin gets the priority when loading and we could defined order 1-100

Re: [s2] Extras build seems to be failing

The compilation is failing as well due to a missing Junit dependency. Fixed that in svn head. I think the warning about pell should be ignorable, i guess. mvn clean test seems to be working ok for me, so does mvn install after adding junit dependency. rgds - Original Message From:

Re: [Proposal] Framework plugin architecture (was Re: [s2] Logging levels)

Sounds cool. Just some thoughts. Maybe we could make the bootstrap struts xml struts-default.xml and the plugins xml struts-plugin.xml while those in the webapp struts.xml. The bootstraping sequence would be 1] struts-default.xml 2] struts-plugins.xml 3] struts.xml This way its easier for

Re: [Proposal] Framework plugin architecture (was Re: [s2] Logging levels)

@struts.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 12 September, 2006 10:35:18 AM Subject: Re: [Proposal] Framework plugin architecture (was Re: [s2] Logging levels) tm jee wrote: Sounds cool. Just some thoughts. Maybe we could make the bootstrap struts xml struts-default.xml and the plugins xml struts

Re: [Proposal] Framework plugin architecture (was Re: [s2] Logging levels)

, 2006 10:29:23 AM Subject: Re: [Proposal] Framework plugin architecture (was Re: [s2] Logging levels) tm jee ha scritto: Another thing we might want to considered is the dependency of plugins. If say plugin A needs some stuff declared in plugin B, it might not work, depending on which gets

Re: [Proposal] Framework plugin architecture (was Re: [s2] Logging levels)

one twice. Don tm jee wrote: I see, I think I might have misunderstood. Please correct me if I am wrong. With, one.jar pac/test.xml two.jar pac/test.xml three.jar pac/test.xml We would get something like (if we iterate over each iteration) jar:file:/.../one.jar!/META-INF

Re: svn commit: r439914 - /struts/maven/trunk/struts2-archetype-starter/README.txt

Ahh... ok, noted. Changed the email address to direct to struts-dev malling list (in svn head). rgds - Original Message From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@struts.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 5 September, 2006 9:37:09 AM Subject: Re: svn commit: r439914 -

Re: [s2] maven archetype

Ooopsss... or I should have check my mail again before creating a jira issue... :-) - Original Message From: Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org Sent: Monday, 4 September, 2006 2:00:49 PM Subject: Re: [s2] maven archetype On 9/3/06, tm jee

Re: Ognl a new dependency?

Could it be that the ognl jar in your local maven repository is being corrupted? Does a clean compile work eg. mvn clean compile ? - Original Message From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org Sent: Saturday, 2 September, 2006 10:36:53 PM

[s2] maven archetype

Hi guys, Is there a way allow resource generated by maven archetype to change dynamically. For example, with mvn archetype:create -DgroupId=com.mycomp -DartifactId=myapp -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.struts -DarchetypeArtifactId=struts2-archetype-starter the structure created should

Re: Ognl a new dependency?

PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org; tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 3 September, 2006 2:51:19 PM Subject: Re: Ognl a new dependency? On 9/3/06, tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could it be that the ognl jar in your local maven repository is being corrupted? Does a clean

Re: svn commit: r439910 - in /struts/maven/trunk/struts2-archetype-starter/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/src: main/java/ main/java/com/ test/java/ test/java/com/

Thx for the info. Fixed in svn head. - Original Message From: Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@struts.apache.org Sent: Monday, 4 September, 2006 12:20:33 PM Subject: Re: svn commit: r439910 - in

Re: [s2] maven archetype

: Re: [s2] maven archetype On 9/3/06, tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way allow resource generated by maven archetype to change dynamically. ... The files under the generated resources directory seems to be static. It doesn't seems to change accordingly with the -DgroupId argument

Re: [VOTE] Retain the ! idiom but disable it by default

I'd prefer it to be turn off by default. I normally use an extra action alias instead of foo!bar. As for cancel action, I'd normally use submit name=action:purchaseCancel / and have an action alias purchaseCancel which could be using the same action class but with a different method defined

Re: [s2] Freemarker transform name

@struts.apache.org; tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 21 August, 2006 7:33:35 AM Subject: Re: [s2] Freemarker transform name I updated that, and the velocity prefix, yesterday. (Check out your Hangman example!) The next biggest task is following up with the taglib proposal. (Starting with refreshing

Re: [s2] Snippet Macro

- if (urlParam.startsWith(com.opensymphony.)) { + if (urlParam.startsWith(org.opensymphony.)) { shouldn't it be com.opensymphony... instead? Thx in advance. - Original Message From: tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org Sent: Saturday

Re: [s2] Snippet Macro

Cheers. Ted. - Original Message From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org Sent: Friday, 18 August, 2006 11:09:14 PM Subject: Re: [s2] Snippet Macro OK, the snippet macro is up and running on the ASF Struts 2 wiki, complete with shortcuts. h2.

[s2] taglib and tld file

What is the decision that was made regarding Struts2 taglib? Previously we are generating them using xdoclet. Its seems now we have to maintain it by hand. What about the html docs about the taglib that is used in the wiki (confluence) under the struts2/doc/ directory? Are those maintained by

Re: [s2] taglib and tld file

thx Ted. Looks like there's no concrete decision reached yet. The ant build is gone as well. - Original Message From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org; tm jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 19 August, 2006 9:13:37 AM Subject: Re: [s2

  1   2   >