my point is sexism is real and men should be fighting to end it, not crying
that everything's hard for everyone.

*Denise Dalphond, Ph.D.*
*ethnomusicologist*
*schoolcraftwax.work <http://schoolcraftwax.work>*

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Peter Bense <textur...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Denise Dalphond <denisedalph...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> "Have any of you ever attended those electronic music events events with
>> *exclusively* female artists?
>>
>> I have.  And in a lot of cases it seemed really awkward -- like the
>> reason they were selected as performers was due to their sex/gender over
>> their accomplishments as a performer/musician.  (To say nothing of the male
>> patrons weirdly 'gawking' over them, which is also super creepy.  A
>> separate issue unto itself.)"
>>
>> You are failing to view those events through the lens of a girl or woman.
>> It is often empowering.
>>
>
> How presumptuous of you?
>
> I went to a number of those events and the other (female) attendees I was
> with were the ones who observed it first.  I have been to some that were
> frankly quite objectifying.
>
>
>> And your taste in music does not match someone else's taste.
>>
>
> No shit it doesn't, we're on a list called "313" which itself is about as
> marginal as it gets.
>
>
>> I can imagine a young girl or young woman looking up at the stage,
>> reading the lineup, researching the female artists she liked; that
>> experience is life changing in a sexist world.
>>
>> A roll call is fine. To what end: in order to learn about more artists
>> who are women because patriarchy makes them harder to come by.
>>
>
> I still think it is poor form to not explain what makes them relevant or
> interesting.  It is already hard enough to talk about music with words, let
> alone to not use any.
>
> Moreover I don't think I understand the substance of your point about as
> to why the "patriarchy makes them harder to come by."
>
> I think it is hard to get recognized as a musician or producer no matter
> *who* you are or *what* your background is.
>

Reply via email to