on thsi whole tiesto tip... i happen to be reviewing his new cd right now, and to my considerable suprise, track 2 definately sounds like somethign i can picture a lot of 313 DJs playing, sans the little breakdown in the middle.
sean's track is coming up next. should be intersting. but if this is what people are dancing too these days, i'd say it's a damn site better than the trance of a few years back. On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Michael Lees wrote: > > Hello 313, > > We all know who the only common enemy is in the USA. It's the UK crap > > trance dj's that have bled the USA dry. And why ? Because the sheep in the > > USA consume that crap. > > I think Fred sums it up best here, music isn't controlled by talent or > originality it's publicity,exposure and fashion. Djs aren't booked on > their talent, it's their name. I'm afraid its the way of the world :) > > I personally agree with Mani's sentiments completely and I applaud his > actions, where he fails however is in his 'mission statement'. To me > it's not EU artists to blame but rather the US promoters who pay these > artists? Which I understand from Mike's emails, Mani includes(or rather > did) himself part of. Then again an artist is only worth what a promoter > is willing to pay and a promoter is willing to pay only what he can make > back.... it's sh*t. > > I'm yet to understand what people are trying to achieve with this > boycott? Do you want US DJs to be making as much money as tietso et al.? > Perhaps someone can explain the ideal goal, it is just a bit more money, > a lot more money, what exactly? > > Oh and what I don't understand is why this was posted to 313 where > clearly everyone on the list "pays homage" to US music? > > -Mike > > This message has been scanned but we cannot guarantee that it and any > attachments are free from viruses or other damaging content: you are > advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the > University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. > >
