Merla - Just HOW MUCH **DID** you folks spend on Pfeiffer Sprays? -Allan

>David,
>
>This is exactly what we're trying to do.  Last year, the county put the mowers
>under the direction of the Weed Supervisor instead of the Road Supervisor and
>our weed taxes that we pay every year went into a rotary mower mowing twice on
>the paved part of the road--3 miles.  But it was late in the season when they
>got that all together and we were into drought season. You can't use a rotary
>mower on a dirt road during drought season.  It's too dusty.  We had a man
>volunteer his sickle bar mower to us and just asked the county to pay his
>diesel fuel.  Two people went out with him with "Men working" signs and they
>did the other 5 miles.  Then with our new professional Stihl 085 weedwhacker,
>my husband and some other men with their own weedwhackers, went along the
>right-of-way and did everything that hadn't been done--the goldbricking
>ranchers, the 50 absentee properties and by the bridges and mailboxes and the
>part away from the road that the mower couldn't reach.  We wrote a good report
>with a whole bunch of pictures every .4 mile to prove that we had 
>actually done
>it.  We could have have done it without that professional Stihl 085 that the
>state bought us.
>
>This was the first year, that we had actually contained the weeds.  We have
>enough support now to finish the job.  Maybe we should just use methods that
>most people understand--allelopathic plants, mulching, Biocontrols, handwork,
>restoration seeding.  I just wanted to add my own touch of BD weed control to
>the mix.
>
>I just feel in my heart that the BD would help so much.  We already fabricated
>a sprayer with a Shurflo pump and a professional trigger nozzle with 
>adjustable
>heads to go on the top of 50 gallon plastic barrels on the back of a pick-up.
>They are wasting a lot of money by not letting us use the Pfeiffer field spray
>and the spray rig.  We could still spray the weed peppers because 
>they were not
>bought.  They were either donated or I made them myself.  It's 
>ashamed that the
>Farm Bureau people would rather waste that money than see us succeed.  It's
>terribly political to challenge the ole boy network in a small conservative
>rural town in the state of Idaho.  They're jealous.  The Farm Bureau is now
>funding a demonstration project at CENEX, the local coop store, with plots of
>"herbicide", "do nothing", etc, to show that they too can do what we're doing.
>It's so obvious.  The Weed Committee should support both groups...and they
>are.  On March7, they voted to continue our moratorium on herbicide spraying.
>The important change would be for the Weed Committee to do some serious
>research on holistic management--and not spend all the weed budget on
>herbicide.  We are now meeting monthly instead of twice a year. 
>Political work
>is very slow and painful.
>
>Merla
>
>D & S Chamberlain wrote:
>
>>  Merla: I thought if I tell you what happens here it might help. The
>>  roadsides are the responsibility of the local council ( your county I think)
>>  they slash the roadsides about twice a year. If this done when the weeds
>>  have just flowered it cuts down the weed establishment. It can be done by
>>  the council using it's own tractor and slasher or they can contract out the
>>  job to someone else. This has the benefit of making the roadside look neat
>>  and maintains a nice green ground cover that protects the soil. It also
>>  reduces the danger of animals running out of long grass in front of cars.
>>  This way the weeds are put to good use. It also reduces the fire risk.
>>
>>  The offshoot to this is that once landowners see the roadway in front of
>>  their property looking good, some not all, then start to take responsibility
>>  for slashing their section more regularly. Once you have the slasher on the
>>  tractor it only takes a couple of hours extra to do the roadside after
>>  you've done your own job.
>>
>>  This is not the perfect answer, the council has cut backs and reduces the
>  > area slashed, not all property owners participate and weather can spoil
>>  programs and plans but it is better and cheaper than spaying large areas.
>>
>>  Hope this helps
>>  David C
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>  From: "Merla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2002 9:59 PM
>>  Subject: Re: Official BD in Brazil
>>
>>  > Jose, Hedleys, anybody,
>>  >
>>  > When I read all this about Brazil BD not working, it makes me wonder
>>  > about what I am doing on the road right-of-way.  It sounds like it might
>>  not
>>  > work to just spray Pfeiffer Field Spray on very sandy, dry soil.  Right
>>  > now, my ability to use it is in question and I'm waiting for a resolution.
>>  > Should I actually get a soil test of the road right-of-way and try to add
>>  > soil amendments?  We are trying to grow native plants and grasses and
>>  > discourage plants that have been named "noxious" by the state and county
>>  > so they won't spray us with 2,4-D and Clopyralid.  You wouldn't want to
>>  > have garden soil, would you?  Anyway, how could you accomplish
>>  > this on 8 miles of road?  We wanted to use the Pfeiffer Field Spray
>>  > so that we wouldn't have to make all those trips down the road with BC,
>>  > 500, 501, 508, Horn clay.  I need to learn how to make preps myself so
>>  > no one has to pay the state a fee to register a BD prep as a soil
>>  amendment.
>>  > We have peppers for all the weeds and wanted to spray them in  BD preps.
>>  > The Hedleys suggested three sprayings a long time ago when I first
>>  > started on this list.  I still haven't firmed down what we're going to do,
>>  > but I feel we should do something to help the soil, especially since the
>>  > county sprayed it in 1999.
>>  >
>>  > We are planning to plant allelopathic plants--rye and oats--to compete
>>  > with the weeds and then eventually seed native plants we do want.
>>  >
>>  > Merla
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Jose Luiz Moreira Garcia wrote:
>>  >
>>  > > >From what I have seen there was very little
>>  > > Composting operation with regard to the size of
>>  > > the whole farm.
>>  > > Secondly, one can enhance natureīs way by adding
>>  > > some key minerals that are in short supply in our
>>  > > geologically old and eroded tropical soils. Lack of nodulation
>>  > > in legumes could very well be a lack of Molybdenum,
>>  > > as I have noticed there.
>>  > > In a soil without a good microbial life one can expect little to
>>  > > no transmutation and therefore I see no chance to correct
>>  > > any defficiency without adding what is missing.
>>  > > This strategy is highly criticized as being " non sustainable"
>>  > > by those fanatics and the situation goes on and on. They regard
>>  > > adding outside farm supplies almost like a sin. They want to free
>>  > > themselves from the "system" and so do I but in a situation like
>>  > > that I donīt think it is intelligent to condemn your soil to
>>  > > starvation simply because they decided that this is "non-sustainable"
>>  > > In my oppinion there should be a another way to face the situation.
>>  > > Some criteria has to be found like level of microbial activity, level
>>  > > of nutrients, etc...
>>  > > Finally, BD is a proven system worldwide and if it does not work in
>>  > > a particular farm or particular region it should be seen simply as
>>  > > incompetence from those who are running those places and in our
>>  > > particular case the official Demeter people.
>>  > >
>>  > > Jose
>>  > >
>>  > > >
>>  > > > On Friday, March 8, 2002, at 07:07 AM, Rural Center for Responsible
>>  > > > Living wrote:
>>  > > >
>>  > > > > Dear Bonnie,
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > Rudolf Steiner made it very clear in the  lectures to farmers that
>>  the
>>  > > > > preparations were meant to enhance a sound animal based compost
>>  > > > > fertility
>>  > > > > management program.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Thanks Christy. Yes. This was my understanding.
>>  > > > > I am a little confused at the Brazilian practices described by
>>  > > > > Jose, since most of the preparations are to be added to compost, and
>>  to
>>  > > > > think of adding compost for 27 years and see no results? Were they
>>  even
>>  > > > > composting?
>>  > > >
>>  > > > That is why I was confused about him telling of folks using the preps
>  > > > > alone. It sounded like they might not even be making compost.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Bonnie York
>>  > > >
>>  >
>>  >

Reply via email to