I really like it (including front page animation)! Looks fresh & modern.
There’s still some placeholders here and there so I won’t comment on those. Some notes on the parts that are filled: - would also put the slack invite page in the “join the community” - the menu on the right side in the docs doesn’t show for “how-to guides” - hovering over a header in the docs shows a permalink button, but the image is just a square Cheers, Bas > On 9 Nov 2019, at 18:07, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > I love it. Including the animation. I think we all need a bit of fun in our > work, no matter how serious we are. Even slack has similar animated > background https://slack.com/intl/en-pl/ (and they are pretty serious). > > I have just two comments: > - we should show stable released documentation by default not 2.0.0. I know > we are looking at it from contributors point of view, but this page is > mostly for users who use "released" software. And I agree with Deng that > versions should be in reverse chronological order. > - maybe - following recent trends - we should have "dark" mode as well ? > The site is very white .... This is a nice-to-have of course and we can add > it later as well (but maybe it is simple even now :)). > > J > > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 5:56 AM Kevin Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Excellent work! I really like it, esp. the documentation part. Thank you >> everyone who contributed to it 👍 >> >> +1 for it is very subjective and I'm in favor of the moving elements. I'm >> not so sure how being a project for serious user would conflict with just >> showing some moving elements in the landing page. Or I'm not even sure what >> does serious user mean. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Kevin Y >> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:46 PM Deng Xiaodong <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Very nice work! >>> >>> - Personally I quite like the moving background elements, and I do not >>> find it distracting. I believe this is very subjective, and we can >> discuss >>> on each other’s preference forever. So... But anyway, if there will be >> any >>> vote, mine is +1 for the current one. >>> >>> - At Documentation page, when I choose version, the order is “Stable >>> (1.10.6) -> 1.10.1-> 1.10.2 -> 1.10.3->…”. But personally I think >> “reverse” >>> order is making more sense, i.e. “Stable (1.10.6) -> 1.10.5-> 1.10.4 -> >>> 1.10.3->…” >>> >>> - Some links are not working yet (maybe they will be handled later?), >>> including: >>> * “View Page Source” button at page >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/ < >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/> >>> * PIP Installation “Quick Start” button at page >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/ < >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/> (it leads me >> to >>> GitHub index page) >>> >>> >>> Again, very nice work! Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> XD >>> >>> >>>> On 9 Nov 2019, at 8:29 AM, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <[email protected] >>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thank you both for your feedback. >>>> >>>> I really dislike the moving background elements on the lading page. I >>>>> already found the previous example when they weren't moving hard to >>> focus >>>>> on other elements such as finding the header menu and going to the >>>>> documentation, for me this is now easily twice as worse. If no one >> else >>>>> agrees with me I guess it's a personal quirk you can ignore as an >>> outlier >>>> >>>> >>>> @Everyone, does majority of you don't like the floating squares on the >>>> landing page? Would you prefer it to be static and something more >> simple >>>> and clean? I would really appreciate if you can share some ideas of >> what >>>> could be a good replacement. >>>> >>>> When clicking "Install" I get "Connect failed", is there a proposed UI >>> for >>>>> this page or is this not part of the demo? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, if you click the "install" on the top right, they both should >> lead >>>> the same page. >>>> >>>> On the documentation page there is a submenu floating on the left side >> of >>>>> the screen which by default has the menus ["Apache Airflow >>> Documentation ", >>>>> "Principles", "Beyond the Horizon", "Content"]. At my desktops default >>>>> resolution (1080p) with my default window size (half horizontal width) >>> that >>>>> submenu is entirely squished and inaccessible. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, I also found few places where text or manu gets squished, like >> when >>>> you search the docs. >>>> >>>> - On mobile the integration boxes are rather oversized (see screen shot >>> of >>>>> it attaches) >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think apache lists do not support the files, so we can't see any >>>> attachments. >>>> >>>> >>>>> - Those link to readthedocs - but they should link to versioned docs >>>>> hosted on our on site. >>>>> >>>> Ack, will pass on this feedback. >>>> >>>> - The version selection in the docs on our site isn't quite working >>> right: >>>>> if I select 1.10.6 it still shows 2.0.0dev >>>>> >>>> Ack, will pass on this feedback. >>>> >>>> - blog posts still populated with placeholders? >>>>> >>>> Correct, case studies page as well. >>>> >>>> >>>>> - after selecting roadmap from the top menu there is a subpage nav >> that >>>>> feels out of place >>>>> >>>> The idea was to have a documentation page, that supports images/graphs, >>>> etc. And if we end up adding more to it in the future. It can be one >> page >>>> only as well. >>>> >>>> - "learn more" from meetup page doesn't go anywhere useful >>>>> >>>> Learn more will lead to the Meetup.com registration page. >>>> >>>> >>>>> - There are two section "collapsers" on the community page: a blue >> arrow >>>>> on the right and a black one on the left (again, see screenshot) >>>>> >>>> Again, can't see the screenshots :( >>>> >>>> >>>>> - we should probably point most users towards users@ not dev@ mailing >>> list >>>>> >>>> Agree. Is user@ list currently active? I am just wondering if people >> are >>>> following that list, and user's questions are getting enough attention. >>>> >>>> - "Primary Members Commiters" heading on Community page should probably >>> say >>>>> "Project Management Committee" >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Hope this list was useful :) >>>>> >>>> +100 :) Thank you. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 8 November 2019 20:08:41 GMT, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi everybody, >>>>>> >>>>>> We are super close to the final version of the Airflow website and we >>>>>> really need YOU to play with the prototype to make sure that >>> everything is >>>>>> working properly. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the link: https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Please submit your feedback on the prototype in this thread before >>> Tuesday, >>>>>> 10.00am CEST. After that it will be Commit-then-Review process. >>>>>> >>>>>> We also need YOUR help to create a website copy. Marta has created >> this >>>>>> document [1] where you can put the information, instructions or >>>>>> guidelines that need to appear in each section. It doesn't need to be >>>>>> perfect, just needs to convey the knowledge that you already have on >>> how to >>>>>> install Airflow or how to submit a bug, for example. I will be adding >>>>>> things myself too. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's make sure that we have the necessary and relevant >>>>>> information available for our users and contributors before we >> publish >>> it. >>>>>> Here is an article on how to write a web copy if anyone wants to >> take a >>>>>> look [2]. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> >>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y4jBjtQ13zeLZ2e3V4foa51pN-168p1DHJ5zc7cbyGg/edit?ts=5dbc78cd >>>>>> [2] https://expresswriters.com/how-to-write-web-copy/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
