I like the animation too and +1 for dark mode. Few observations: - on documentation page, it was not intuitive for me that the menu is scrollable, should a scroll bar be added? - on documentation page, the search loop is mixed with input field (my screen 1680x1050)
In overall I really love the new page ;) Bests, Tomek On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 11:23 PM Felix Uellendall <felue...@pm.me.invalid> wrote: > I like the animation, too. :) Maybe we can also change the animation a bit > so that the squares do not disappear and instead bounce back when they hit > the borders. > > +1 for Dark Mode (but actually even I am a dark mode user I really like > the current one with white background) As Jarek said I think we can also > add it later, don’t need it initially :) > > Best Regards, > Felix > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 20:32, Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl> > wrote: > > > I like the floating squares :-) > > > > Op za 9 nov. 2019 om 19:17 schreef Bas Harenslak < > > basharens...@godatadriven.com>: > > > >> I really like it (including front page animation)! Looks fresh & modern. > >> > >> There’s still some placeholders here and there so I won’t comment on > those. > >> > >> Some notes on the parts that are filled: > >> - would also put the slack invite page in the “join the community” > >> - the menu on the right side in the docs doesn’t show for “how-to > guides” > >> - hovering over a header in the docs shows a permalink button, but the > >> image is just a square > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Bas > >> > >> > On 9 Nov 2019, at 18:07, Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > I love it. Including the animation. I think we all need a bit of fun > in > >> our > >> > work, no matter how serious we are. Even slack has similar animated > >> > background https://slack.com/intl/en-pl/ (and they are pretty > serious). > >> > > >> > I have just two comments: > >> > - we should show stable released documentation by default not 2.0.0. I > >> know > >> > we are looking at it from contributors point of view, but this page is > >> > mostly for users who use "released" software. And I agree with Deng > that > >> > versions should be in reverse chronological order. > >> > - maybe - following recent trends - we should have "dark" mode as > well ? > >> > The site is very white .... This is a nice-to-have of course and we > can > >> add > >> > it later as well (but maybe it is simple even now :)). > >> > > >> > J > >> > > >> > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 5:56 AM Kevin Yang <yrql...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Excellent work! I really like it, esp. the documentation part. Thank > >> you > >> >> everyone who contributed to it 👍 > >> >> > >> >> +1 for it is very subjective and I'm in favor of the moving elements. > >> I'm > >> >> not so sure how being a project for serious user would conflict with > >> just > >> >> showing some moving elements in the landing page. Or I'm not even > sure > >> what > >> >> does serious user mean. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> Kevin Y > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:46 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd.den...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Very nice work! > >> >>> > >> >>> - Personally I quite like the moving background elements, and I do > not > >> >>> find it distracting. I believe this is very subjective, and we can > >> >> discuss > >> >>> on each other’s preference forever. So... But anyway, if there will > be > >> >> any > >> >>> vote, mine is +1 for the current one. > >> >>> > >> >>> - At Documentation page, when I choose version, the order is “Stable > >> >>> (1.10.6) -> 1.10.1-> 1.10.2 -> 1.10.3->…”. But personally I think > >> >> “reverse” > >> >>> order is making more sense, i.e. “Stable (1.10.6) -> 1.10.5-> > 1.10.4 -> > >> >>> 1.10.3->…” > >> >>> > >> >>> - Some links are not working yet (maybe they will be handled > later?), > >> >>> including: > >> >>> * “View Page Source” button at page > >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/ < > >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/> > >> >>> * PIP Installation “Quick Start” button at page > >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/ < > >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/> (it > leads me > >> >> to > >> >>> GitHub index page) > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Again, very nice work! Thanks! > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> XD > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>> On 9 Nov 2019, at 8:29 AM, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < > >> aizha...@apache.org > >> >>> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thank you both for your feedback. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I really dislike the moving background elements on the lading > page. I > >> >>>>> already found the previous example when they weren't moving hard > to > >> >>> focus > >> >>>>> on other elements such as finding the header menu and going to the > >> >>>>> documentation, for me this is now easily twice as worse. If no one > >> >> else > >> >>>>> agrees with me I guess it's a personal quirk you can ignore as an > >> >>> outlier > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> @Everyone, does majority of you don't like the floating squares on > the > >> >>>> landing page? Would you prefer it to be static and something more > >> >> simple > >> >>>> and clean? I would really appreciate if you can share some ideas of > >> >> what > >> >>>> could be a good replacement. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> When clicking "Install" I get "Connect failed", is there a > proposed UI > >> >>> for > >> >>>>> this page or is this not part of the demo? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Yes, if you click the "install" on the top right, they both should > >> >> lead > >> >>>> the same page. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On the documentation page there is a submenu floating on the left > side > >> >> of > >> >>>>> the screen which by default has the menus ["Apache Airflow > >> >>> Documentation ", > >> >>>>> "Principles", "Beyond the Horizon", "Content"]. At my desktops > >> default > >> >>>>> resolution (1080p) with my default window size (half horizontal > >> width) > >> >>> that > >> >>>>> submenu is entirely squished and inaccessible. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Yes, I also found few places where text or manu gets squished, like > >> >> when > >> >>>> you search the docs. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> - On mobile the integration boxes are rather oversized (see screen > >> shot > >> >>> of > >> >>>>> it attaches) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I think apache lists do not support the files, so we can't see any > >> >>>> attachments. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> - Those link to readthedocs - but they should link to versioned > docs > >> >>>>> hosted on our on site. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> Ack, will pass on this feedback. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> - The version selection in the docs on our site isn't quite working > >> >>> right: > >> >>>>> if I select 1.10.6 it still shows 2.0.0dev > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> Ack, will pass on this feedback. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> - blog posts still populated with placeholders? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> Correct, case studies page as well. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> - after selecting roadmap from the top menu there is a subpage nav > >> >> that > >> >>>>> feels out of place > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> The idea was to have a documentation page, that supports > >> images/graphs, > >> >>>> etc. And if we end up adding more to it in the future. It can be > one > >> >> page > >> >>>> only as well. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> - "learn more" from meetup page doesn't go anywhere useful > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> Learn more will lead to the Meetup.com registration page. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> - There are two section "collapsers" on the community page: a blue > >> >> arrow > >> >>>>> on the right and a black one on the left (again, see screenshot) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> Again, can't see the screenshots :( > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> - we should probably point most users towards users@ not dev@ > >> mailing > >> >>> list > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> Agree. Is user@ list currently active? I am just wondering if > people > >> >> are > >> >>>> following that list, and user's questions are getting enough > >> attention. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> - "Primary Members Commiters" heading on Community page should > >> probably > >> >>> say > >> >>>>> "Project Management Committee" > >> >>>> > >> >>>> +1 > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Hope this list was useful :) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> +100 :) Thank you. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> On 8 November 2019 20:08:41 GMT, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < > >> >>>>> aizha...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Hi everybody, > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> We are super close to the final version of the Airflow website > and > >> we > >> >>>>>> really need YOU to play with the prototype to make sure that > >> >>> everything is > >> >>>>>> working properly. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Here is the link: > https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/ > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Please submit your feedback on the prototype in this thread > before > >> >>> Tuesday, > >> >>>>>> 10.00am CEST. After that it will be Commit-then-Review process. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> We also need YOUR help to create a website copy. Marta has > created > >> >> this > >> >>>>>> document [1] where you can put the information, instructions or > >> >>>>>> guidelines that need to appear in each section. It doesn't need > to > >> be > >> >>>>>> perfect, just needs to convey the knowledge that you already > have on > >> >>> how to > >> >>>>>> install Airflow or how to submit a bug, for example. I will be > >> adding > >> >>>>>> things myself too. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Let's make sure that we have the necessary and relevant > >> >>>>>> information available for our users and contributors before we > >> >> publish > >> >>> it. > >> >>>>>> Here is an article on how to write a web copy if anyone wants to > >> >> take a > >> >>>>>> look [2]. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> [1] > >> >>>>>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y4jBjtQ13zeLZ2e3V4foa51pN-168p1DHJ5zc7cbyGg/edit?ts=5dbc78cd > >> >>>>>> [2] https://expresswriters.com/how-to-write-web-copy/ > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > Jarek Potiuk > >> > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > >> > > >> > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > >> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > >> > >> -- Tomasz Urbaszek Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Junior Software Engineer M: +48 505 628 493 <+48505628493> E: tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com <tomasz.urbasz...@polidea.com> Unique Tech Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work>
