Can we reuse the animation for a new Airflow 404 page? ;-) On 13 Nov 2019, at 15:01, Chris Hendrixson <ch...@astronomer.io<mailto:ch...@astronomer.io>> wrote:
I like the concept of the floating squares, though, as-is, they seem a bit like confetti. I think the Slack implementation works really well because, with the recognizable logos, it still feels relevant to Slack. An idea: What if they were a different shape? Something a bit more relevant to Airflow? I recently designed an icon — attached — to represent the Airflow UI and I used these little pill-shaped icons to represent DAGs. Maybe something like this could work? Using the various Airflow colors? On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 2:29 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <aizha...@apache.org<mailto:aizha...@apache.org>> wrote: Thank you all for your feedback. I will pass them to the team who is implementing and hopefully share the new version in a day or two. On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 3:48 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com<mailto:tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com>> wrote: > I like the animation too and +1 for dark mode. Few observations: > - on documentation page, it was not intuitive for me that the menu is > scrollable, should a scroll bar be added? > - on documentation page, the search loop is mixed with input field (my > screen 1680x1050) > > In overall I really love the new page ;) > > Bests, > Tomek > > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 11:23 PM Felix Uellendall > <felue...@pm.me.invalid<mailto:felue...@pm.me.invalid>> > wrote: > > > I like the animation, too. :) Maybe we can also change the animation a > bit > > so that the squares do not disappear and instead bounce back when they > hit > > the borders. > > > > +1 for Dark Mode (but actually even I am a dark mode user I really like > > the current one with white background) As Jarek said I think we can also > > add it later, don’t need it initially :) > > > > Best Regards, > > Felix > > > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > > > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 20:32, Driesprong, Fokko > > <fo...@driesprong.frl<mailto:fo...@driesprong.frl>> > > wrote: > > > > > I like the floating squares :-) > > > > > > Op za 9 nov. 2019 om 19:17 schreef Bas Harenslak < > > > basharens...@godatadriven.com<mailto:basharens...@godatadriven.com>>: > > > > > >> I really like it (including front page animation)! Looks fresh & > modern. > > >> > > >> There’s still some placeholders here and there so I won’t comment on > > those. > > >> > > >> Some notes on the parts that are filled: > > >> - would also put the slack invite page in the “join the community” > > >> - the menu on the right side in the docs doesn’t show for “how-to > > guides” > > >> - hovering over a header in the docs shows a permalink button, but the > > >> image is just a square > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > >> Bas > > >> > > >> > On 9 Nov 2019, at 18:07, Jarek Potiuk > > >> > <jarek.pot...@polidea.com<mailto:jarek.pot...@polidea.com>> > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > I love it. Including the animation. I think we all need a bit of fun > > in > > >> our > > >> > work, no matter how serious we are. Even slack has similar animated > > >> > background https://slack.com/intl/en-pl/ (and they are pretty > > serious). > > >> > > > >> > I have just two comments: > > >> > - we should show stable released documentation by default not > 2.0.0. I > > >> know > > >> > we are looking at it from contributors point of view, but this page > is > > >> > mostly for users who use "released" software. And I agree with Deng > > that > > >> > versions should be in reverse chronological order. > > >> > - maybe - following recent trends - we should have "dark" mode as > > well ? > > >> > The site is very white .... This is a nice-to-have of course and we > > can > > >> add > > >> > it later as well (but maybe it is simple even now :)). > > >> > > > >> > J > > >> > > > >> > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 5:56 AM Kevin Yang > > >> > <yrql...@gmail.com<mailto:yrql...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Excellent work! I really like it, esp. the documentation part. > Thank > > >> you > > >> >> everyone who contributed to it 👍 > > >> >> > > >> >> +1 for it is very subjective and I'm in favor of the moving > elements. > > >> I'm > > >> >> not so sure how being a project for serious user would conflict > with > > >> just > > >> >> showing some moving elements in the landing page. Or I'm not even > > sure > > >> what > > >> >> does serious user mean. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Cheers, > > >> >> Kevin Y > > >> >> > > >> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:46 PM Deng Xiaodong > > >> >> <xd.den...@gmail.com<mailto:xd.den...@gmail.com>> > > >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> Very nice work! > > >> >>> > > >> >>> - Personally I quite like the moving background elements, and I do > > not > > >> >>> find it distracting. I believe this is very subjective, and we can > > >> >> discuss > > >> >>> on each other’s preference forever. So... But anyway, if there > will > > be > > >> >> any > > >> >>> vote, mine is +1 for the current one. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> - At Documentation page, when I choose version, the order is > “Stable > > >> >>> (1.10.6) -> 1.10.1-> 1.10.2 -> 1.10.3->…”. But personally I think > > >> >> “reverse” > > >> >>> order is making more sense, i.e. “Stable (1.10.6) -> 1.10.5-> > > 1.10.4 -> > > >> >>> 1.10.3->…” > > >> >>> > > >> >>> - Some links are not working yet (maybe they will be handled > > later?), > > >> >>> including: > > >> >>> * “View Page Source” button at page > > >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/ < > > >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/> > > >> >>> * PIP Installation “Quick Start” button at page > > >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/ < > > >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/> (it > > leads me > > >> >> to > > >> >>> GitHub index page) > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Again, very nice work! Thanks! > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> XD > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> On 9 Nov 2019, at 8:29 AM, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < > > >> aizha...@apache.org<mailto:aizha...@apache.org> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Thank you both for your feedback. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> I really dislike the moving background elements on the lading > > page. I > > >> >>>>> already found the previous example when they weren't moving hard > > to > > >> >>> focus > > >> >>>>> on other elements such as finding the header menu and going to > the > > >> >>>>> documentation, for me this is now easily twice as worse. If no > one > > >> >> else > > >> >>>>> agrees with me I guess it's a personal quirk you can ignore as > an > > >> >>> outlier > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> @Everyone, does majority of you don't like the floating squares > on > > the > > >> >>>> landing page? Would you prefer it to be static and something more > > >> >> simple > > >> >>>> and clean? I would really appreciate if you can share some ideas > of > > >> >> what > > >> >>>> could be a good replacement. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> When clicking "Install" I get "Connect failed", is there a > > proposed UI > > >> >>> for > > >> >>>>> this page or is this not part of the demo? > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> Yes, if you click the "install" on the top right, they both > should > > >> >> lead > > >> >>>> the same page. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> On the documentation page there is a submenu floating on the left > > side > > >> >> of > > >> >>>>> the screen which by default has the menus ["Apache Airflow > > >> >>> Documentation ", > > >> >>>>> "Principles", "Beyond the Horizon", "Content"]. At my desktops > > >> default > > >> >>>>> resolution (1080p) with my default window size (half horizontal > > >> width) > > >> >>> that > > >> >>>>> submenu is entirely squished and inaccessible. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Yes, I also found few places where text or manu gets squished, > like > > >> >> when > > >> >>>> you search the docs. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> - On mobile the integration boxes are rather oversized (see > screen > > >> shot > > >> >>> of > > >> >>>>> it attaches) > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> I think apache lists do not support the files, so we can't see > any > > >> >>>> attachments. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>> - Those link to readthedocs - but they should link to versioned > > docs > > >> >>>>> hosted on our on site. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> Ack, will pass on this feedback. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> - The version selection in the docs on our site isn't quite > working > > >> >>> right: > > >> >>>>> if I select 1.10.6 it still shows 2.0.0dev > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> Ack, will pass on this feedback. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> - blog posts still populated with placeholders? > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> Correct, case studies page as well. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>> - after selecting roadmap from the top menu there is a subpage > nav > > >> >> that > > >> >>>>> feels out of place > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> The idea was to have a documentation page, that supports > > >> images/graphs, > > >> >>>> etc. And if we end up adding more to it in the future. It can be > > one > > >> >> page > > >> >>>> only as well. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> - "learn more" from meetup page doesn't go anywhere useful > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> Learn more will lead to the Meetup.com<http://Meetup.com> > > >> >>>> registration page. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>> - There are two section "collapsers" on the community page: a > blue > > >> >> arrow > > >> >>>>> on the right and a black one on the left (again, see screenshot) > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> Again, can't see the screenshots :( > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>> - we should probably point most users towards users@ not dev@ > > >> mailing > > >> >>> list > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> Agree. Is user@ list currently active? I am just wondering if > > people > > >> >> are > > >> >>>> following that list, and user's questions are getting enough > > >> attention. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> - "Primary Members Commiters" heading on Community page should > > >> probably > > >> >>> say > > >> >>>>> "Project Management Committee" > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> +1 > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Hope this list was useful :) > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>> +100 :) Thank you. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>> On 8 November 2019 20:08:41 GMT, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < > > >> >>>>> aizha...@apache.org<mailto:aizha...@apache.org>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Hi everybody, > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> We are super close to the final version of the Airflow website > > and > > >> we > > >> >>>>>> really need YOU to play with the prototype to make sure that > > >> >>> everything is > > >> >>>>>> working properly. > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Here is the link: > > https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/ > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Please submit your feedback on the prototype in this thread > > before > > >> >>> Tuesday, > > >> >>>>>> 10.00am CEST. After that it will be Commit-then-Review process. > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> We also need YOUR help to create a website copy. Marta has > > created > > >> >> this > > >> >>>>>> document [1] where you can put the information, instructions or > > >> >>>>>> guidelines that need to appear in each section. It doesn't need > > to > > >> be > > >> >>>>>> perfect, just needs to convey the knowledge that you already > > have on > > >> >>> how to > > >> >>>>>> install Airflow or how to submit a bug, for example. I will be > > >> adding > > >> >>>>>> things myself too. > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Let's make sure that we have the necessary and relevant > > >> >>>>>> information available for our users and contributors before we > > >> >> publish > > >> >>> it. > > >> >>>>>> Here is an article on how to write a web copy if anyone wants > to > > >> >> take a > > >> >>>>>> look [2]. > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> [1] > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y4jBjtQ13zeLZ2e3V4foa51pN-168p1DHJ5zc7cbyGg/edit?ts=5dbc78cd > > >> >>>>>> [2] https://expresswriters.com/how-to-write-web-copy/ > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > > > >> > Jarek Potiuk > > >> > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > >> > > > >> > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48%20660%20796%20129> <+48660796129 > <+48%20660%20796%20129>> > > >> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > > >> > > >> > > > > -- > > Tomasz Urbaszek > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Junior Software Engineer > > M: +48 505 628 493 <+48%20505%20628%20493> <+48505628493 > <+48%20505%20628%20493>> > E: tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com<mailto:tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com> > <tomasz.urbasz...@polidea.com<mailto:tomasz.urbasz...@polidea.com>> > > Unique Tech > Check out our projects! <https://www.polidea.com/our-work> >
