I like the floating squares :-) Op za 9 nov. 2019 om 19:17 schreef Bas Harenslak < basharens...@godatadriven.com>:
> I really like it (including front page animation)! Looks fresh & modern. > > There’s still some placeholders here and there so I won’t comment on those. > > Some notes on the parts that are filled: > - would also put the slack invite page in the “join the community” > - the menu on the right side in the docs doesn’t show for “how-to guides” > - hovering over a header in the docs shows a permalink button, but the > image is just a square > > Cheers, > > Bas > > > On 9 Nov 2019, at 18:07, Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> wrote: > > > > I love it. Including the animation. I think we all need a bit of fun in > our > > work, no matter how serious we are. Even slack has similar animated > > background https://slack.com/intl/en-pl/ (and they are pretty serious). > > > > I have just two comments: > > - we should show stable released documentation by default not 2.0.0. I > know > > we are looking at it from contributors point of view, but this page is > > mostly for users who use "released" software. And I agree with Deng that > > versions should be in reverse chronological order. > > - maybe - following recent trends - we should have "dark" mode as well ? > > The site is very white .... This is a nice-to-have of course and we can > add > > it later as well (but maybe it is simple even now :)). > > > > J > > > > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 5:56 AM Kevin Yang <yrql...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Excellent work! I really like it, esp. the documentation part. Thank > you > >> everyone who contributed to it 👍 > >> > >> +1 for it is very subjective and I'm in favor of the moving elements. > I'm > >> not so sure how being a project for serious user would conflict with > just > >> showing some moving elements in the landing page. Or I'm not even sure > what > >> does serious user mean. > >> > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Kevin Y > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:46 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd.den...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Very nice work! > >>> > >>> - Personally I quite like the moving background elements, and I do not > >>> find it distracting. I believe this is very subjective, and we can > >> discuss > >>> on each other’s preference forever. So... But anyway, if there will be > >> any > >>> vote, mine is +1 for the current one. > >>> > >>> - At Documentation page, when I choose version, the order is “Stable > >>> (1.10.6) -> 1.10.1-> 1.10.2 -> 1.10.3->…”. But personally I think > >> “reverse” > >>> order is making more sense, i.e. “Stable (1.10.6) -> 1.10.5-> 1.10.4 -> > >>> 1.10.3->…” > >>> > >>> - Some links are not working yet (maybe they will be handled later?), > >>> including: > >>> * “View Page Source” button at page > >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/ < > >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/> > >>> * PIP Installation “Quick Start” button at page > >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/ < > >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/> (it leads me > >> to > >>> GitHub index page) > >>> > >>> > >>> Again, very nice work! Thanks! > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> XD > >>> > >>> > >>>> On 9 Nov 2019, at 8:29 AM, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < > aizha...@apache.org > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Thank you both for your feedback. > >>>> > >>>> I really dislike the moving background elements on the lading page. I > >>>>> already found the previous example when they weren't moving hard to > >>> focus > >>>>> on other elements such as finding the header menu and going to the > >>>>> documentation, for me this is now easily twice as worse. If no one > >> else > >>>>> agrees with me I guess it's a personal quirk you can ignore as an > >>> outlier > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> @Everyone, does majority of you don't like the floating squares on the > >>>> landing page? Would you prefer it to be static and something more > >> simple > >>>> and clean? I would really appreciate if you can share some ideas of > >> what > >>>> could be a good replacement. > >>>> > >>>> When clicking "Install" I get "Connect failed", is there a proposed UI > >>> for > >>>>> this page or is this not part of the demo? > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, if you click the "install" on the top right, they both should > >> lead > >>>> the same page. > >>>> > >>>> On the documentation page there is a submenu floating on the left side > >> of > >>>>> the screen which by default has the menus ["Apache Airflow > >>> Documentation ", > >>>>> "Principles", "Beyond the Horizon", "Content"]. At my desktops > default > >>>>> resolution (1080p) with my default window size (half horizontal > width) > >>> that > >>>>> submenu is entirely squished and inaccessible. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Yes, I also found few places where text or manu gets squished, like > >> when > >>>> you search the docs. > >>>> > >>>> - On mobile the integration boxes are rather oversized (see screen > shot > >>> of > >>>>> it attaches) > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I think apache lists do not support the files, so we can't see any > >>>> attachments. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - Those link to readthedocs - but they should link to versioned docs > >>>>> hosted on our on site. > >>>>> > >>>> Ack, will pass on this feedback. > >>>> > >>>> - The version selection in the docs on our site isn't quite working > >>> right: > >>>>> if I select 1.10.6 it still shows 2.0.0dev > >>>>> > >>>> Ack, will pass on this feedback. > >>>> > >>>> - blog posts still populated with placeholders? > >>>>> > >>>> Correct, case studies page as well. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - after selecting roadmap from the top menu there is a subpage nav > >> that > >>>>> feels out of place > >>>>> > >>>> The idea was to have a documentation page, that supports > images/graphs, > >>>> etc. And if we end up adding more to it in the future. It can be one > >> page > >>>> only as well. > >>>> > >>>> - "learn more" from meetup page doesn't go anywhere useful > >>>>> > >>>> Learn more will lead to the Meetup.com registration page. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - There are two section "collapsers" on the community page: a blue > >> arrow > >>>>> on the right and a black one on the left (again, see screenshot) > >>>>> > >>>> Again, can't see the screenshots :( > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - we should probably point most users towards users@ not dev@ > mailing > >>> list > >>>>> > >>>> Agree. Is user@ list currently active? I am just wondering if people > >> are > >>>> following that list, and user's questions are getting enough > attention. > >>>> > >>>> - "Primary Members Commiters" heading on Community page should > probably > >>> say > >>>>> "Project Management Committee" > >>>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Hope this list was useful :) > >>>>> > >>>> +100 :) Thank you. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On 8 November 2019 20:08:41 GMT, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < > >>>>> aizha...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi everybody, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We are super close to the final version of the Airflow website and > we > >>>>>> really need YOU to play with the prototype to make sure that > >>> everything is > >>>>>> working properly. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here is the link: https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please submit your feedback on the prototype in this thread before > >>> Tuesday, > >>>>>> 10.00am CEST. After that it will be Commit-then-Review process. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We also need YOUR help to create a website copy. Marta has created > >> this > >>>>>> document [1] where you can put the information, instructions or > >>>>>> guidelines that need to appear in each section. It doesn't need to > be > >>>>>> perfect, just needs to convey the knowledge that you already have on > >>> how to > >>>>>> install Airflow or how to submit a bug, for example. I will be > adding > >>>>>> things myself too. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Let's make sure that we have the necessary and relevant > >>>>>> information available for our users and contributors before we > >> publish > >>> it. > >>>>>> Here is an article on how to write a web copy if anyone wants to > >> take a > >>>>>> look [2]. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] > >>>>>> > >>> > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y4jBjtQ13zeLZ2e3V4foa51pN-168p1DHJ5zc7cbyGg/edit?ts=5dbc78cd > >>>>>> [2] https://expresswriters.com/how-to-write-web-copy/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Jarek Potiuk > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > >
