I like the animation, too. :) Maybe we can also change the animation a bit so that the squares do not disappear and instead bounce back when they hit the borders.
+1 for Dark Mode (but actually even I am a dark mode user I really like the current one with white background) As Jarek said I think we can also add it later, don’t need it initially :) Best Regards, Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 20:32, Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl> wrote: > I like the floating squares :-) > > Op za 9 nov. 2019 om 19:17 schreef Bas Harenslak < > basharens...@godatadriven.com>: > >> I really like it (including front page animation)! Looks fresh & modern. >> >> There’s still some placeholders here and there so I won’t comment on those. >> >> Some notes on the parts that are filled: >> - would also put the slack invite page in the “join the community” >> - the menu on the right side in the docs doesn’t show for “how-to guides” >> - hovering over a header in the docs shows a permalink button, but the >> image is just a square >> >> Cheers, >> >> Bas >> >> > On 9 Nov 2019, at 18:07, Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> wrote: >> > >> > I love it. Including the animation. I think we all need a bit of fun in >> our >> > work, no matter how serious we are. Even slack has similar animated >> > background https://slack.com/intl/en-pl/ (and they are pretty serious). >> > >> > I have just two comments: >> > - we should show stable released documentation by default not 2.0.0. I >> know >> > we are looking at it from contributors point of view, but this page is >> > mostly for users who use "released" software. And I agree with Deng that >> > versions should be in reverse chronological order. >> > - maybe - following recent trends - we should have "dark" mode as well ? >> > The site is very white .... This is a nice-to-have of course and we can >> add >> > it later as well (but maybe it is simple even now :)). >> > >> > J >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 5:56 AM Kevin Yang <yrql...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Excellent work! I really like it, esp. the documentation part. Thank >> you >> >> everyone who contributed to it 👍 >> >> >> >> +1 for it is very subjective and I'm in favor of the moving elements. >> I'm >> >> not so sure how being a project for serious user would conflict with >> just >> >> showing some moving elements in the landing page. Or I'm not even sure >> what >> >> does serious user mean. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Kevin Y >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:46 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd.den...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Very nice work! >> >>> >> >>> - Personally I quite like the moving background elements, and I do not >> >>> find it distracting. I believe this is very subjective, and we can >> >> discuss >> >>> on each other’s preference forever. So... But anyway, if there will be >> >> any >> >>> vote, mine is +1 for the current one. >> >>> >> >>> - At Documentation page, when I choose version, the order is “Stable >> >>> (1.10.6) -> 1.10.1-> 1.10.2 -> 1.10.3->…”. But personally I think >> >> “reverse” >> >>> order is making more sense, i.e. “Stable (1.10.6) -> 1.10.5-> 1.10.4 -> >> >>> 1.10.3->…” >> >>> >> >>> - Some links are not working yet (maybe they will be handled later?), >> >>> including: >> >>> * “View Page Source” button at page >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/ < >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/> >> >>> * PIP Installation “Quick Start” button at page >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/ < >> >>> https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/> (it leads me >> >> to >> >>> GitHub index page) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Again, very nice work! Thanks! >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> XD >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> On 9 Nov 2019, at 8:29 AM, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < >> aizha...@apache.org >> >>> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Thank you both for your feedback. >> >>>> >> >>>> I really dislike the moving background elements on the lading page. I >> >>>>> already found the previous example when they weren't moving hard to >> >>> focus >> >>>>> on other elements such as finding the header menu and going to the >> >>>>> documentation, for me this is now easily twice as worse. If no one >> >> else >> >>>>> agrees with me I guess it's a personal quirk you can ignore as an >> >>> outlier >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> @Everyone, does majority of you don't like the floating squares on the >> >>>> landing page? Would you prefer it to be static and something more >> >> simple >> >>>> and clean? I would really appreciate if you can share some ideas of >> >> what >> >>>> could be a good replacement. >> >>>> >> >>>> When clicking "Install" I get "Connect failed", is there a proposed UI >> >>> for >> >>>>> this page or is this not part of the demo? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Yes, if you click the "install" on the top right, they both should >> >> lead >> >>>> the same page. >> >>>> >> >>>> On the documentation page there is a submenu floating on the left side >> >> of >> >>>>> the screen which by default has the menus ["Apache Airflow >> >>> Documentation ", >> >>>>> "Principles", "Beyond the Horizon", "Content"]. At my desktops >> default >> >>>>> resolution (1080p) with my default window size (half horizontal >> width) >> >>> that >> >>>>> submenu is entirely squished and inaccessible. >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Yes, I also found few places where text or manu gets squished, like >> >> when >> >>>> you search the docs. >> >>>> >> >>>> - On mobile the integration boxes are rather oversized (see screen >> shot >> >>> of >> >>>>> it attaches) >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I think apache lists do not support the files, so we can't see any >> >>>> attachments. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> - Those link to readthedocs - but they should link to versioned docs >> >>>>> hosted on our on site. >> >>>>> >> >>>> Ack, will pass on this feedback. >> >>>> >> >>>> - The version selection in the docs on our site isn't quite working >> >>> right: >> >>>>> if I select 1.10.6 it still shows 2.0.0dev >> >>>>> >> >>>> Ack, will pass on this feedback. >> >>>> >> >>>> - blog posts still populated with placeholders? >> >>>>> >> >>>> Correct, case studies page as well. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> - after selecting roadmap from the top menu there is a subpage nav >> >> that >> >>>>> feels out of place >> >>>>> >> >>>> The idea was to have a documentation page, that supports >> images/graphs, >> >>>> etc. And if we end up adding more to it in the future. It can be one >> >> page >> >>>> only as well. >> >>>> >> >>>> - "learn more" from meetup page doesn't go anywhere useful >> >>>>> >> >>>> Learn more will lead to the Meetup.com registration page. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> - There are two section "collapsers" on the community page: a blue >> >> arrow >> >>>>> on the right and a black one on the left (again, see screenshot) >> >>>>> >> >>>> Again, can't see the screenshots :( >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> - we should probably point most users towards users@ not dev@ >> mailing >> >>> list >> >>>>> >> >>>> Agree. Is user@ list currently active? I am just wondering if people >> >> are >> >>>> following that list, and user's questions are getting enough >> attention. >> >>>> >> >>>> - "Primary Members Commiters" heading on Community page should >> probably >> >>> say >> >>>>> "Project Management Committee" >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 >> >>>> >> >>>> Hope this list was useful :) >> >>>>> >> >>>> +100 :) Thank you. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> On 8 November 2019 20:08:41 GMT, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < >> >>>>> aizha...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Hi everybody, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> We are super close to the final version of the Airflow website and >> we >> >>>>>> really need YOU to play with the prototype to make sure that >> >>> everything is >> >>>>>> working properly. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Here is the link: https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/ >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Please submit your feedback on the prototype in this thread before >> >>> Tuesday, >> >>>>>> 10.00am CEST. After that it will be Commit-then-Review process. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> We also need YOUR help to create a website copy. Marta has created >> >> this >> >>>>>> document [1] where you can put the information, instructions or >> >>>>>> guidelines that need to appear in each section. It doesn't need to >> be >> >>>>>> perfect, just needs to convey the knowledge that you already have on >> >>> how to >> >>>>>> install Airflow or how to submit a bug, for example. I will be >> adding >> >>>>>> things myself too. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Let's make sure that we have the necessary and relevant >> >>>>>> information available for our users and contributors before we >> >> publish >> >>> it. >> >>>>>> Here is an article on how to write a web copy if anyone wants to >> >> take a >> >>>>>> look [2]. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> [1] >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y4jBjtQ13zeLZ2e3V4foa51pN-168p1DHJ5zc7cbyGg/edit?ts=5dbc78cd >> >>>>>> [2] https://expresswriters.com/how-to-write-web-copy/ >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Jarek Potiuk >> > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer >> > >> > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> >> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >> >>
