* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:19 PM +0200 André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > the old outdated NCSA config directives? We add and add and add code -- > > which is not actually bad. But where's the man with the broom? > > Sounds a like job for someone. How about nominating modules for removal in > 2.1, or at the very least split them off to an 'unmaintained' distribution? > We can leave them there, but boot them out of our 'core' distribution. 2.0 > saw the introduction of mod_dav and mod_ssl - two fairly large modules, but > no real reductions elsewhere.
I think, this a good idea in general. In conclusion with some *very* easy mechanism to add modules on the fly (something for a modules.apache.org revision?). Perhaps a standard module distribution framework like in perl or python, autogenerated makefile templates etc. Anyway I'd start the list with mod_imap and mod_cern_meta... > My #1 vote is to throw mod_rewrite clear off the island. =) -- justin ;-) mod_rewrite is now maintained again (since my huge commitments some months ago). Hey, it's even faster now ;-)) nd -- Winnetous Erbe: <http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>
