> Instead of spending my time with updating all the Dojo stuff, i could spend > my time to migrate all Prototype / Dojo based Code to jQuerry.
One sample application(or we can say functionality) would be of great help. Then everyone can see the live functionality and can comment accordingly! -- Ashish On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Sascha Rodekamp <sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hey guys, > > i started the work to update the Dojo libary to the current version 1.4. > And i have to say that it didn't satisfy me to work on every Dojo based > JaveScript for a little version update. It will coast a lot of time to test > and update all the JavaScript Code. And what we have at the end a new heavy > Dojo libary which brings a lot of widget but it's hard to extend :-) > > So i have another (maybe better idea). Why we didn't set Dojo and Prototype > as depricated > and starting to use jQuerry. In my optinion jQuerry is a better invest in > the future. There are a lot of Widget/ Plugin's too and it's much lighter > than Dojo. > > Instead of spending my time with updating all the Dojo stuff, i could spend > my time to migrate all Prototype / Dojo based Code to jQuerry. > > What do you think? > > Cheers > Sascha > > 2010/6/5 Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> > >> Looks like good plan. Overtime people might choose to replace prototype >> framework with similar thing from Dojo. >> >> Thanks and Regards >> Anil Patel >> HotWax Media Inc >> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" >> >> On Jun 5, 2010, at 1:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> > So far I have mostly used Dojo for its tree in a CMS tool, and some >> Prototype functions notably for layered lookups. >> > I still see them as complementary (Dojo coming more complete but heavier, >> Prototype being mostly an API). >> > I does do think it's necessary to make a choice. >> > >> > Jacques >> > >> > From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@yahoo.com> >> >> >From what I recall, the two libraries were included in the project with >> the idea that the most popular one would get used. At the >> >> >time, Dojo was a very heavy library and the first attempts to use it >> resulted in very slow page loads. I used Prototype in some >> >> >initial Ajax work - mainly because it was pretty easy to use. Today, I >> have no preference for either one. >> >> >> >> -Adrian >> >> >> >> --- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> From: Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> >> >>> Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4 >> >>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org >> >>> Cc: "Anil Patel" <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> >> >>> Date: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 7:00 AM >> >>> I started using Dojo in Ofbiz long >> >>> back and in six months because of issues faced we switched >> >>> to using prototype. At that time there were few others in >> >>> comunity who liked prototype better. But I really don't >> >>> remember the reasons. >> >>> >> >>> Since then new checkout process was added that uses >> >>> prototype for all javascript needs. But did not remove Dojo >> >>> because i did not want to upset anybody in community. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks and Regards >> >>> Anil Patel >> >>> HotWax Media Inc >> >>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword >> >>> "ofbiz" >> >>> >> >>> On Jun 5, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > I have created a branch >> >>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/dojo1.4 >> >>> > Nothing else for now >> >>> > >> >>> > Jacques >> >>> > >> >>> > From: "Sascha Rodekamp" <sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com> >> >>> >> Hi Jacques ... >> >>> >> jep it's a lot of work but not impossible :) >> >>> >> A brunch is a good idea to start working on this >> >>> project. I think the reason >> >>> >> for Antil was, that he isn't use to Dojo. But that >> >>> shouldn't be a problem >> >>> >> the syntax isn't complicated. >> >>> >> And by the way, if this will work the new Dojo >> >>> will bring us a big benefit >> >>> >> (in my opinion). >> >>> >> Cheers >> >>> >> Sascha >> >>> >> 2010/6/5 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> >> >>> >>> Sascha, >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> We should rather use the dev ML for this >> >>> thread. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Maybe it's the reason why Anil was reluctant >> >>> to use Dojo? >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Jacques >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> Sascha Rodekamp wrote: >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>>> Hey, >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> so i started upgrading to dojo 1.4. >> >>> >>>>> The good point is ... Dojo 1.4 has >> >>> many really cool new Features which >> >>> >>>>> can >> >>> >>>>> help us to improve the UI. >> >>> >>>>> The Bad thing is, some parts of the >> >>> syntax had changed. That effects many >> >>> >>>>> parts in OFBiz (OnePageCheckout, >> >>> Trees, all Dojo features Scripts :-)). >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Arg, I did not thought it will be so much >> >>> trouble :/ >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> So that's a lot of work and i can't do it >> >>> on my own ... who volunteer to >> >>> >>>>> help me ;) ?? >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> I could help >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> First Step is to collect all depending >> >>> issues and than to fix them step >> >>> >>>>> by >> >>> >>>>> step. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> So if we do that we need a branch I >> >>> guess... >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Jacques >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Have a nice day >> >>> >>>>> Sascha >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> -- >> http://www.lynx.de >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > > > -- > http://www.lynx.de >
