On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Les Mikesell wrote:
> format. ReiserFS uses btrees for directories so the search scales > much better and I think XFS uses some sort of directory hashing. > Either should be much better for that kind of use, and XFS has > the advantage of ACLs that samba can map to match NT settings. There are also Posix ACL patches for EXT3 which seem mature enough for production use. See http://acl.bestbits.at/faq.html I wonder how important the performance issues are in typical SME server applications. Have you noticed any real life performance issues which you have diagnosed as being due to the file system or kernel version used? -- Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lead Product Developer Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com/ Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/ Phone: +1 (613) 368 4376 or 564 8000 Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739 -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
