Ouch.  

I'm kind of confused at your anger.  Do you feel you are not getting your
money's worth?

j.


Quoting Tim McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 01:52, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> > The developers need to decide whether freenet is ready for general use or
> > not.  They have led a lot of people to have some expectation of usefulness
> > despite the fact that it is clearly alpha software yet they have a release
> > called "stable". I suspect part of the problem is major bugs in
> > implementation compounded by lack of testing and scientific method in
> > diagnosing bugs (ie. running NGR and older stuff). But others disagree. :)
> <RANT>
> 
> I personally agree with your description of the problem, although there
> isn't a darned thing I can do about it. Fred has become essentially
> unusable here - the only things I'm able to fetch are things that were
> stored local to my node MONTHS AGO. This is pathetic. I have a broadband
> connection with a 36GB store allocated to freenet, only ~2GB is actually
> being used however. What I find completely astonishing about this though
> is that with my outbound limited to 10KB/S I'm almost getting as many
> hits locally as servers 'globally' - That just sounds *wrong* to me, or
> freenet really is so badly off now that my node is doing better than it
> should be.
> 
> I am using build 6220. Fproxy bookmarks page has NO LINKS other than
> ones local in the store working. Zero dbr links!
> 
> Just for the record, this is the jvm from my environment page. I was
> told by people to use this version as the newest jvm has serious bugs.
> If this has changed, and explains my PERVERSE problems, please tell me.
> 
> JVM Vendor
>                Sun Microsystems Inc.
> JVM Name
>           Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
> JVM Version
>                         1.4.1_04-b01
> 
> Frost, which was working a couple of days ago on an earlier version of
> freenet isn't even able to function AT ALL now. It's finding NO posts,
> at all. It's unable to INSERT my posts, either. I did not upgrade frost,
> only freenet. So, it's freenet not working.
> 
> >From network load:
> Global mean traffic (queries per hour):12522.75
> Local mean traffic (queries per hour): 10290.3510404307667
> 
> See what I mean?! What's UP with this?! My node is limited to 10KB/S
> outbound bandwidth - is the network seriously this starved for
> information that mine is actually providing the majority of bandwidth in
> my area?!
> 
> Things have been getting progressively worse as time has gone on. I
> mean, seriously - things are WORSE for me now than when I initially
> JOINED with 0.5.0. Anyone else remember the amusing (if you weren't
> trying to deal with it) screwups?
> 
> Seriously, if I was a developer I'd neuter the current development tree
> and go back to a known working version, even if it was slower, even if
> it had problems - because right now things are GENEROUSLY fucked, and
> NOTHING is working right. And before you go off telling me to use
> stable, I tried using stable. The reason why I WENT to unstable is that
> stable is just about as usable as unstable right now, and has been for
> months. WHY is it things are allowed to PERSIST like this? If you know
> something in the development tree is having problems, why on EARTH do
> you stuff it into the stable tree as you obviously have? Stable trees
> should be old things that don't get touched often - because you want
> them to NOT be used for experimentation. Development trees are for that.
> Please, for the LOVE OF GOD, stop putting partially tested things into
> the stable tree.
> 
> I'm going to give freenet one more month to improve. If I don't see
> improvement AT LEAST to the level that *some* dbr pages start showing up
> in my fproxy bookmarks again, preferably to the level that 0.5.0
> 'functioned' - I'm giving up, deleting my store and I'll find some other
> anonymizing system. THAT ACTUALLY WORKS.
> 
> Yeah, I'm angry. If you want to ban me from the email list, do so. I
> don't care. I'm tired of this - people just point fingers everywhere
> when I ask what the reasons are for the problems persisting. (not
> EXISTING, PERSISTING. They aren't being fixed.)
> </RANT>
> 
> Thank you,
> Good NIGHT.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
> 



_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to