On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 20:06, Dan Merillat wrote: > > is that with my outbound limited to 10KB/S I'm almost getting as many > > hits locally as servers 'globally' - That just sounds *wrong* to me, or > > freenet really is so badly off now that my node is doing better than it > > should be. > > Global _AVERAGE_. It means your server is slightly slower then the > average server out there. It does _NOT_ mean that you're handling > 80%+ of the requests in freenet total! Yeah. I admit I fouled this up. I'm sorry for misunderstanding.
> > I'm going to give freenet one more month to improve. If I don't see > > improvement AT LEAST to the level that *some* dbr pages start showing up > > in my fproxy bookmarks again, preferably to the level that 0.5.0 > > 'functioned' - I'm giving up, deleting my store and I'll find some other > > anonymizing system. THAT ACTUALLY WORKS. > > Good luck. I'm already having quite a bit by using prodnet. But, that's my decision. > As a side, can we ban "old" unstable builds from the network? > Allow stable >= last release, unstable >= a few builds ago, > experimental >= a few builds ago. Most of the arguments against > randomly bumping builds is about killing the last release. But since > then there have been TONS of unstable nodes, all of which are allowed, > and quite a few have lethal network bugs. (Like the opening of millions > of connections and never using them) > > Unless we do that already and I'm missing something, but looks like we > are still allowing unstable from 654, and ANY Stable build. > > freenet.Version.checkGoodVersion() is what I'm looking into. I'd like to see this implemented as well. I apologize to anyone I offended for getting so angry about the problems I was experiencing. I'll try not to rant like that again here, it wasn't exactly productive. Timothy C. McGrath _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
