On 9 Sep 2014 at 16:16:42, Thomas Mortagne
([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9 Sep 2014 at 15:49:06, Thomas Mortagne
> >> ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > On 9 Sep 2014 at 15:23:35, Eduard Moraru
> >>> > ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> +1 for Thomas' logic. If its own maker dropped support for it, there
> >>> >> is no
> >>> >> logic in us supporting it. "simple and easy to defend”.
> >>> >
> >>> > -1 because:
> >>> >
> >>> > A) it’s very difficult to know which support you’re talking about (see
> >>> > below for examples of the 4 dates for IE6.0.x)
> >>> > B) it has never worked like this and never will… It all depends on our
> >>> > use base and what they are using...
> >>> > C) Based on your rule we should still support IE6 SP3 since it’s still
> >>> > supported by MS on Windows Server 2003! (see below)
> >>>
> >>> You should reread what I suggested: "only the most current version of
> >>> Internet Explorer available for a supported operating system”.
> >>
> >> I was replying to Edy’s comment:
> >> "If its own maker dropped support for it, there is no logic in us
> >> supporting it. "simple and easy to defend”."
> >>
> >> I think there has been some confusion about your proposal then because
> >> there are 2 different things:
> >> - not supporting a IE version that MS doesn’t support
> >> - only supporting the latest IE version
> >>
> >>> So
> >>> based on what's on
> >>> http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/lifecycle.
> >>>
> >>> So no we would not have to support IE6, we would actually drop IE8 and 9.
> >>
> >> And IE10 I guess since the most recent is IE11.
> >
> > Again you did not really carefully read what I said, I never talked
> > about the latest IE, I talked about the lastest IE in supported
> > systems. The last IE in Windows Vista is IE10.
>
> And again that's the rule MS plan to apply, they just delayed the
> application of this rule. See the blog post I mentioned.
[snip]
If you mean, we should do the same as we do for FF and Chrome, then sure, once
we can confirm that the big majority of Windows users are using the latest IE,
then we can decide this too. I have some doubts though since large companies
have always been very conservative in upgrading their browser versions because
they develop apps for a given version and upgrading usually costs a lot. It
could work I guess but it may take some time for mentalities to evolve and it
depends on how good MS is in not breaking backward compatibility… ;)
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
