> > > E-Gold needs to identify account owners too. I don't know if they > > > plan to do this, but I would like to see some sort of 'low balance > > > limit' on accounts whose owners cannot be identified with certainty. > > > > That would be the END of e-gold. > > Why? > > Craig Because the value of e-gold derives from its utility as a means that enables individuals to trade freely in defiance of the state. It would cease to be useful for this purpose if submission to the state, which is what identification amounts to, is required as a condition of using the system. CCS --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & Identi... George Matyjewicz
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... CCS
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Bob
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Craig Haynie
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Jeff Fitzmyers
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... CCS
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... CCS
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Craig Haynie
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... CCS
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Craig Haynie
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Sidd
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Goldfinger Coin and Bullion Inc.
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Dale Pond
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... CCS
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Eric Gaither, Gaithman's E-Gold Exchange
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Sidd
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... CCS
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... B Ray
- [e-gold-list] Re: SR & I... Sidd