Is there anyone here besides me who has actually read original TM research studies? Anyone here with enough science background, and importantly statistical methods education, to understand what you are reading? Does anyone here understand that there are serious bias issues regarding research conducted, designed or supported by insiders?
I was looking at Doug's index this morning and found this thread. Reading this thread is an interesting review of confirmation bias, probably the most common cognitive error that humans make. Methinks y'all protest too much.