--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Remember a great man once said the government reflect the consciousness of the people. I have seen how that part of my mentality that is BUSHIAN has made as much of a mess of my own life as George Has made of the world. > > I believe in Kicking ass. I believe in full force attacks. If someone declares war on me I will hit them on every possible level before we go to battle. The only difference between me and Bush may be intelligence and how we use our resources. Yet I have had to really look at the Bush in me. > > So who we put in the white house is reflective of our state of consciousness as a nation. If I have a choice of seeing a film about an English butler and an English maid, or a Film with Arnold S ripping the heads off some believed terror ist I have chosen the Arnold film. Or Bruce Lee films where they fight to resolve issues. > > Of course a good Robert Redford movie is much more rewarding. However the box office indicates that Schwartzenegger movies make more money..... > > So maybe it is not so good to laugh at and make mockery of the Dali Lama, or kill monks or support genocide in any form. Maybe the people who have fought for the liberation of the very country might have a problem with the new Capitalism. GOD = GOOD even Atheist believe in the GOOD. So the idea of Jesus may be a little much to accept. Yet the idea of a personal God that inspires one to evolve is not a bad thing. > > However people getting carried away is reflective in the current state of affairs. So Maharishi is 1000% correct in saying that we have to change things from the level of consciousness because there is where the only real change can take place. Changing the consciousness of the masses will change governments through the transformation from the level of consciousness perhaps there will be no need for Terror or guerrilla warfare. >
I hope you're right Louis, I always root for the opitimist. And I've taken part in many a WPA myself. To me the Maharishi Effect is a case of 'theory not proved'. It seems like the world is just turning on oblivious of us, wars, financial disaster, food crisis, environmental collapse, and yet we have pundits everywhere. Maybe I'm too cynical but it aint lookin so good to me. Not yet. But I do hope you're right. > I dont just believe in God I know it from a very scientific and intimate basis. Yet it is not to be confused with the banana peel. God is that but the human consciousness can only be where it is. Look at how it varies in this group. Then you can see the world. Maharishi technology is like a tuning fork without it there is just chaos....... I'm sure I get what you would call the intimate knowledge of God, my heart is overflowing with it, and I can see where all the devotion comes from. I just call it something else that's all. I think all people are the same, they are just switched on to their hearts or they are not. And the "nots" are perhaps where the problems lies? The scientific part escapes me, I think God has been remarkably elusive there. > sandiego108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sandiego108" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > His father had promised him a car for his birthday. Dad was > > > nowhere > > > > in sight. His mother gave him 5.00$, yet what he had > received > > > was a > > > > grace from God that on his birthday the sun and the birds > awakened > > > > him, the sweet smells of the divine filled the air and he knew > > > without > > > > a doubt that there had to be a God and that God just gave him > the > > > > greatest birthday gift ever................. > > > > > > > > > > > > So following this weather based theology we can assume that God > > > > absolutely hates China and dropped a huge earthquake on it's > ass > > > and > > > > despises Burma and sent them a nasty cyclone? > > > > > > > > It seems a little grandiose and narcissistic to me to > attribute a > > > > day's weather to God's intention to give him a bitch'n > birthday > > > while > > > > his same power over the weather is causing untold misery and > > death > > > in > > > > other places. > > > > > > > > > I think we as humans like to look for patterns and extrapolate > our > > > intelligence onto nature. Whether we do it through a belief in > God > > > or in science, the motive is the same, and either belief remains > > > full of holes when viewed superficially. > > > > > > > > > I don't think the motive is the same, opposite in fact. > > I sum it up as; Religion claims to explain reality whereas > > science is an *attempt* to explain experience. You have to > > remove projection to do science it wouldn't work otherwise, > > you have to keep challenging things or you never progress. > > "you have to keep challenging things or you never progress." > > Agreed, both in science and regarding God. > > > If a creationist ends up in the White house you could have > > "intelligent design" taught to kids and instantly their > > education stops because of the limit a religious belief > > has insisted be put on discovery. Not in the spirit of > > science at all as spotting where the holes are in a theory > > is how it all moves on. > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > To subscribe, send a message to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Or go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links >
