At 2:01 AM -0800 9/21/02, Mark D. Lew wrote: > > >To me that feels very roundabout and geeky. On the other hand, I don't >particularly mind typing out "Kyrie eleison, eleison, eleison! Kyrie >eleison, eleison! Christe eleison, eleison, eleison, eleison, eleison! >Christe eleison! Kyrie eleison, eleison, eleison! Kyrie eleison, eleison! >Christe eleison, eleison! Christe eleison! Kyrie eleison, eleison, eleison! >Christe eleison, eleison, eleison, eleison, eleison, eleison! Kyrie >eleison!" That is the singer's text, after all, so why wouldn't I type it? >That took me all of about 30 seconds to type out, which is probably less >than it will take to assign the syllables. The real work is in the >assignment, not the typing, so shifting the work over to the assignment >side is a net minus. > >That's how it seems to me, anyway. Perhaps it looks different to someone >who doesn't use click-assignment, or to someone who is a slow typist. >Mileages vary.
I am a slow typist, and I prefer to type it in once, then duplicate using copy and paste wherever neccessary. But like you, I find it slow to click-assign one note at a time, and am happy to have all the lyrics in order first, then opt-click assign 'em all in one happy go. I like the feeling I get, like when I use a power tool to accomplish a hard job. Or when I use TG Tools... 8-) _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
