David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip]
> I don't think it should be a program option -- making things user
> settings does not take away the basic disorganized thinking that
> leads to implementing it in that way.
>
So now we have to do things your way? At least if you want to be able
to do things your way let those of who can't understand your inability
to know that your measure 91 is in the 3rd region of the piece you are
working on continue to work as we like. Why should things change just
for you?
If you want to go to measure 91, you simply type 91 in the box and the
program will jump to that measure. Why should you want to have to type
3: in addition, since there is only one measure 91 in your work? The
program knows where to go to find it, even if you don't.
I, for one, like the way it is implemented and have no confusion working
with it.
But I would certainly have no problem with what you are asking for being
a program option so you could use it as you think suits you best. Why
would you not want to accord me (and the others who have no problem with
it) the same privilege?
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
