On 26 Sep 2002 at 14:56, Mark D. Lew wrote:

> At 1:12 PM 09/26/02, David W. Fenton wrote:
> 
> >I don't see any utility at all in omitting the section number for
> >measures that fall within a measure number region.
> 
> Well, if your entire piece is numbered normally, then every measure falls
> within a measure number region.
> 
> I think the "utility" is the idea that some newbie will see "1:2" and go
> "Huh? what does that mean?"  The "2" alone is far less likely to confuse,
> so the program is designed to avoid the double number as much as possible.

Well, if there's only one region, show no region number.

If there is more than one region, *show* the region number, always.

I just don't see the utility in knowing that I am looking at measure 
numbers that are unique across regions.

Oops, just thought of something -- non-everlapping numbers. I guess 
that's what you meant.

So, if there's no overlap of *any* numbers, show them without the 
region. If there's any overlap of numbers, show the region.

I just can't imagine a reason, other than ease of programming to 
allow for the non-overlapping numbering, that would justify not 
showing the region number in the case of a file with multiple regions 
with the same numbers.

> Anyway, I think it must be extremely easy to offer it as a program option
> to always display the region number with the measure number. Then everyone
> could be happy.  Make it a feature request.

This is the kind of thing that most users, who are not as ornery as 
me, would simply not worry about and just say, "ho hum -- that's the 
way it is" and not try to figure out why. But to me, it's just messy 
and inconvenient.

I don't think it should be a program option -- making things user 
settings does not take away the basic disorganized thinking that 
leads to implementing it in that way.

-- 
David W. Fenton                 |       http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associates         |       http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to