Dude

No one caaaaaaaaaaaaaares

Go away

-James

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:20 PM, bottige...@gmail.com <bottige...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> You could have ignored it. You could have just said "Not true, but it's
>> not the time and place to discuss it here."
>
>
> I already stated our reasons for ignoring things like this which we have
> done for many years, and just doesn't work. A weak response like "Not true"
> and not offering any sort of substantial response is not going to convince
> anyone either.
>
> This is exactly the time and the place to discuss it. What exactly do you
> accomplish if you let other people slander you in public and you only
> respond in private??? If you don't refute them in public, then people will
> just assume they are telling the truth.
>
> It is sad that you are all so invested in this idea and terrified that
> Valve will ignore it that you cannot even tolerate 3 replies that weren't
> really off-topic.
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Chris Dunphy <cdunph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Did I say you don’t have the right to respond? You certainly do. Respond
>> if you want, but do it literally anywhere else but here. Do not clog up the
>> mailing list with this nonsense. This list is not for airing your dirty
>> laundry, which I can assure you absolutely nobody on this list cares about.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Take it elsewhere.*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *bottige...@gmail.com
>> *Sent: *Thursday, November 9, 2017 3:58 PM
>> *To: *Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
>> <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com>
>> *Subject: *Re: [hlds] Proposal
>>
>>
>>
>> I think that was the most embarrassing little "fight" I've ever seen on a
>> mailing list. No serious server owner should be this petty and willing to
>> fight on a *public mailing list for Team Fortress 2 updates*. At least
>> have the decency to be childish in private.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't think we are being childish for defending ourselves. We ignored
>> things like this before and it has led to many lies being spread about us
>> that have perpetuated even now like having pay2win or being confused with
>> saigns. If someone is going to call us out in public, especially someone
>> that has been slandering us for 7 years, we have a right to respond.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am confused why you are expressing anger towards us when 404 was the
>> one that derailed this thread in the first place and blames us for being
>> the reason why Valve can't do this proposal when he is guilty of the thing
>> he accuses us of.
>>
>>
>>
>> This was a choice between defending ourselves, or slightly cluttering up
>> a suggestion that probably has 0 chance of being done since it was already
>> suggested to Valve many years ago... It was an easy choice to make, and I
>> would make the same choice again.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Chris Dunphy <cdunph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think that was the most embarrassing little "fight" I've ever seen on a
>> mailing list. No serious server owner should be this petty and willing to
>> fight on a *public mailing list for Team Fortress 2 updates*. At least
>> have the decency to be childish in private.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:12 AM, James Haikin <jfrra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey bottiger?
>>
>>
>>
>> No
>>
>>
>>
>> One
>>
>>
>>
>> Cares
>>
>>
>> -James
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:10 PM, bottige...@gmail.com <
>> bottige...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This complaint about economics is a red herring that "404 user not found"
>> was just using to slander us. Valve had no problems enforcing the economic
>> rules before by making plugin given hats and weapons invisible in the game.
>> If particles were really such a big deal, they would've made them invisible
>> already. They already actively enforce economic rules in CS:GO, a game
>> where community servers are also forced to be inferior to official ones. If
>> throwing community servers into the browser solved the econ problem, then
>> why didn't they remove invisible hats and weapons? So the reality is that
>> Valve still polices the economy regardless of community servers being
>> ghettoized or not.
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, back when plugin hats were still possible and rampant, we never
>> used it. So to paint us as some kind of serial anti-valve rule breaker is
>> simply wrong.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think at this point there is no real solution that Valve is interested
>> in doing, otherwise they would have done so a lot sooner now that it has
>> been what, about 3 years since community servers were removed from
>> quickplay? The idea to have white-listing cost money has been suggested
>> many times before and while it is a real solution, Valve does not seem to
>> be interested in this given the inaction.
>>
>>
>>
>> As I mentioned earlier, the most we could hope for is to have them throw
>> in a few community-server only contracts. But even if Valve somehow agreed
>> with the idea, I don't think it would be enough to stop the massive decline
>> that's going on right now.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Rowedahelicon <
>> theoneando...@rowedahelicon.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think at least to stay on topic, there is a matter of the economy rules
>> Valve set in place, which I've always felt have been very vague when it
>> comes into really specific cases like this. Ideally speaking, I feel like
>> if what constitutes as a "valve approved" server would be very bare bones,
>> but if you want to run setups that one would find questionable is why you'd
>> have separate servers for that reason
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:12 PM, bottige...@gmail.com <
>> bottige...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You are upset that this thread is going a little off topic but I am
>> simply defending my community and at the same time refuting his silly
>> argument that pro-community actions are useless because we abuse Valve's
>> rules.
>>
>>
>>
>> We used to let accusations like this go uncontested and it resulted in
>> having our community being wrongfully mixed up with saigns and other
>> falsehoods. So we now aggressively fight them before they can spread.
>>
>>
>>
>> If he wants to stop his 7 year old grudge for being banned for racism for
>> 1 day and getting mad that we charge people for server benefits instead of
>> running servers with welfare money like he did, then there wouldn't be any
>> reason to respond.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am sure that most people here would do the same instead of keeping
>> quiet.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Tohru Adachi <tohruada...@8chan.co>
>> wrote:
>>
>> ...Can we please stop with the drama, both of you? This isn't the place
>> for it.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09/11/2017 00:53, bottige...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Where exactly do you see that I'm selling unusuals? Because I'm not. I
>> don't sell anything.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hmm really, you want to prove you are blatantly lying again like you did
>> on alliedmods with your alt account abrandnewday.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/nyuMwV0.png
>>
>>
>>
>> https://forums.alliedmods.net/showthread.php?t=243705
>>
>>
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/wLOj1oS.png
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
>> please visit:
>>
>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Matthew (Rowedahelicon) Robinson*
>> Web Designer / Artist / Writer
>> Website - http://www.rowedahelicon.com/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to