Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond - Requests

[Carmen Vitullo]

Barb, how did you get my apply and accept sysouts :)

joking aside, these datasets are the same datasets I've always had space 
issues with or I needed to up the directory size, go thru the pain of 
allocating a .NEW datasets larger, or with more directories or both, 
copy the failed library to the new one, rename, delete.....rerun only to 
get a D37 on another dataset :(

other issues I've had was the SMPWRKx datasets are ALWAYS under allocated

Carmen

On 7/23/2021 3:27 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
Its interesting, because I don’t have any products that give me extra extents 
except what SMS does for me space wise, and I have never increased my dataset 
size allocations.
Just as a preparation for increasing allocations, here is what failed x37 in 
the past 8 refreshes (all on the *installation* target volume, never IPL'd 
from). I apply maintenance twice a year, too, and it is always upwards of 
1000ptfs. SMPE was dealing with a few of those x37 doing in-flight compresses, 
but I had only the last refresh without having to increase sizes.
#1
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,LINKLIB,SYS1.LINKLIB
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,NUCLEUS,SYS1.NUCLEUS
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SASMMOD1,ASM.SASMMOD1
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SCSFMOD0,CSF.SCSFMOD0
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SCSFMOD0,CSF.SCSFMOD0
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SGIMLMD0,GIM.SGIMLMD0
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SGIMLMD0,GIM.SGIMLMD0
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SCSFMOD0,CSF.SCSFMOD0
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SCSFMOD0,CSF.SCSFMOD0
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SGIMLMD0,GIM.SGIMLMD0
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SCEERUN,CEE.SCEERUN
#2
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SGIMTENU,GIM.SGIMTENU
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SHASMIG,SYS1.SHASMIG
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SHASMIG,SYS1.SHASMIG
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SISFLOAD,ISF.SISFLOAD
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SHASMIG,SYS1.SHASMIG
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SHASMIG,SYS1.SHASMIG
IOEZ00312I Dynamic growth of aggregate xxxxx.SIZUUSRD in progress
#3
Made an error during increase of data sets, ended up restoring everything and 
increasing (joblogs from before restore not saved)
SCBDMENU
SMPSTS 16->50 trks, sec 5
SASMMOD1 50->80 trks
#4
Accept of previous maintenance:
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,ACCEPT,ABBLLIB,BBL.ABBLLIB
Apply new:
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,LINKLIB,SYS1.LINKLIB
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SICELINK,SYS1.SICELINK
#5
Accept of previous maintenance:
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,ACCEPT,AGIMTENU,GIM.AGIMTENU
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,ACCEPT,AERBPWSV,SYS1.AERBPWSV
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,ACCEPT,AHAPINC3,HAP.AHAPINC3
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,ACCEPT,AGIMTENU,GIM.AGIMTENU
Apply new:
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SERBPWSV,SYS1.SERBPWSV
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SEEQINST,SYS1.SEEQINST
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,MIGLIB,SYS1.MIGLIB
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SCSFMOD0,CSF.SCSFMOD0
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SISFLOAD,ISF.SISFLOAD
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SCEERUN,CEE.SCEERUN
#6
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SERBLINK,SYS1.SERBLINK
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,CMDLIB,SYS1.CMDLIB
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,LINKLIB,SYS1.LINKLIB
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,NUCLEUS,SYS1.NUCLEUS
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SASMMOD1,ASM.SASMMOD1
#7
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SISFTLIB,ISF.SISFTLIB
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SERBPWSV,SYS1.SERBPWSV
IOEZ00312I Dynamic growth of aggregate xxxxx.SAZFAMOD in progress
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SERBLINK,SYS1.SERBLINK
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SISFLOAD,ISF.SISFLOAD
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,SCEELPA,CEE.SCEELPA
#8
Accept of previous maintenance:
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,1,ACCEPT,AGIMTENU,GIM.AGIMTENU
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,1,ACCEPT,AISFTLIB,ISF.AISFTLIB
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,1,ACCEPT,AAZFAMOD,AZF.AAZFAMOD
IEC032I E37-04,IFG0554P,1,ACCEPT,AHAPINC3,HAP.AHAPINC3
Apply new:
IEC031I D37-04,IFG0554P,,APPLY,DGTLLIB,SYS1.DGTLLIB

With z/OS 2.5, I'll probably triple allocations for those data sets during 
allocation.

That being said, my cloning process copies my res volume and ZFS datasets to 
new volumes and resets extents to current used, which is why I never used the 
software deployment and NEVER will in z/OSMF.
Right now the plan is for my successor to install z/OSMF once we're on 2.5. *I* 
will certainly NEVER use z/OSMF to do the rollout to all the other sysplexes. 
Cloning is done in 4 jobs and they work and are easily controlled.
  
Regards, Barbara

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
/I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to 
succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand 
with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, 
and part with him when he goes wrong. *Abraham Lincoln*/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN