l...@garlic.com (Anne & Lynn Wheeler) writes:
> Endicott then complains tht the 5-way 370/125 SMP has better
> performance and better price/performance than 370/148 and I'm required
> in escalation meetings to argue both sides. Endicott wins ... and the
> 5-way SMP 370/125 is never announced.

re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#80 Great mainframe history(?)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#81 GREAT presentation on the history of 
the mainframe
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#82 Great mainframe history(?)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#83 Great mainframe history(?)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#84 Great mainframe history(?)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#85 Great mainframe history(?)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2017c.html#86 GREAT presentation on the history of 
the mainframe

note later, 3033 was really threatened by 4341 ... clusters of 4341 had
better performance, throughput, price/performance, lower floor
footprint, lower environmentals and power/instruction than 3033.  at one
point head of POK was so threatened that he got allocation of critical
4341 manufacturing component cut in half.

some large customers were also ordering hundreds of 4300s at a time for
placing out in departmental areas ... the leading edge of the coming
distributed computing tsunami. Internally, IBM was putting so many
distributed 4300s out in departmental conference rooms that conference
rooms became a scarce commodity.

The big explosion in distributed 4300s also attracted the MVS group,
they had the problem was that the only disks for non-datacenter were FBA
and MVS never bothered with FBA support. Eventually they did come out
with 3375, CKD simulated on FBA3370 ... however it didn't do much good,
the distributed environment requirement was also for scores of 4300
systems per support person ... while MVS required scores of support
people per system. some old 4300 email
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/lhwemail.html#4341

I also got sucked into doing early benchmarks (on engineering 4341) for
LLNL that was looking at getting 70 for computer farm ... leading edge
of the coming cluster supercomputers. single 4341 benchmarked faster
than 370/158 and 3031 (in addition to clusters having better throughput
and price/performance than 3033). past posts mentioning "RAIN" benchmark
(objective was that it run approx. as fast as CDC6600)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#0 Is a VAX a mainframe?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#67 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#0 Microcode?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#75 Computers in Science Fiction
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#7 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine 
was it?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#12 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine 
was it?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#19 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine 
was it?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#22 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine 
was it?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#4 misc. old benchmarks (4331 & 11/750)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#68 IBM zSeries in HPC
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2005m.html#25 IBM's mini computers--lack thereof
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006x.html#31 The Future of CPUs: What's After 
Multi-Core?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006y.html#21 moving on
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007d.html#62 Cycles per ASM instruction
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009d.html#54 mainframe performance
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009l.html#67 ACP, One of the Oldest Open Source 
Apps
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009r.html#37 While watching Biography about Bill 
Gates on CNBC last Night
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011c.html#65 Comparing YOUR Computer with 
Supercomputers of the Past
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011d.html#40 IBM Watson's Ancestors: A Look at 
Supercomputers of the Past
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012n.html#45 Under what circumstances would it be 
a mistake to migrate applications/workload off the mainframe?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013.html#38 DEC/PDP minicomputers for business in 
1968?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013c.html#53 What Makes an Architecture Bizarre?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014c.html#61 I Must Have Been Dreaming (36-bit 
word needed for ballistics?)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014j.html#37 History--computer performance 
comparison chart
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2015h.html#71 Miniskirts and mainframes
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2015h.html#106 DOS descendant still lives was Re: 
slight reprieve on the z
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2016e.html#116 How the internet was invented
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2016h.html#44 Resurrected! Paul Allen's tech team 
brings 50-year-old supercomputer back from the dead
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2016h.html#49 Resurrected! Paul Allen's tech team 
brings 50-year -old supercomputer back from the dead
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2016h.html#51 Resurrected! Paul Allen's tech team 
brings 50-year -old supercomputer back from the dead

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to