On 24 March 2017 at 13:43, Anne & Lynn Wheeler <l...@garlic.com> wrote: > boeblingon got their hands slapped by corporate for the 370/115 & > 370/125. The 370/115 had nine-position memory bus for microprocessors > ... all identical ... one microprocessor was programmed for simulating > 370 instructions and one or several other microprocessors programmed > with controller microcode (i.e. not only integrated channels, but also > integrated controllers).
Boeblingen got their hands slapped for anti-trust reasons for moving the controllers inside (shades of the 2319 disk), or because corporate inherently favoured Endicott over Boeblingen (and presumably POK over both)? Or something else? Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN