On 24 March 2017 at 13:43, Anne & Lynn Wheeler <l...@garlic.com> wrote:
> boeblingon got their hands slapped by corporate for the 370/115 &
> 370/125. The 370/115 had nine-position memory bus for microprocessors
> ... all identical ... one microprocessor was programmed for simulating
> 370 instructions and one or several other microprocessors programmed
> with controller microcode (i.e. not only integrated channels, but also
> integrated controllers).

Boeblingen got their hands slapped for anti-trust reasons for moving
the controllers inside (shades of the 2319 disk), or because corporate
inherently favoured Endicott over Boeblingen (and presumably POK over
both)? Or something else?

Tony H.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to