Les, > On Oct 5, 2022, at 1:14 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > <ginsberg=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > [LES:] It is clear that we have different opinions on this – and there are > multiple folks on both sides of this discussion. > What I would hope we can agree on is to separate the discussion of adding > advertisement of “feature supported” from the MP-TLV draft by writing a > separate draft on this proposal. > This would allow the two pieces of work to progress independently – as they > should. > > This makes sense to me since the proposal to advertise feature support is > clearly not limited to MP-TLV and has no bearing on how MP-TLVs are encoded. > > Can we agree on this?
Sorry, I’m not on board with this. The two functions would end up disconnected, all the way to the field. T
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
