Some videos of a type of liuto forte or lute-guitar from about 45
years ago or so. I believe it's from Armenia :

http://www.youtube.com/user/peglegsam#p/u/92/uuSkaD30VW4

http://www.youtube.com/user/peglegsam#p/u/115/6Raw90U-AOQ

http://www.youtube.com/user/peglegsam#p/u/89/YnbvozcGAnY

GDR

On 12/20/09, Mark Wheeler <l...@pantagruel.de> wrote:
> Well if you find playing "a guitar in form of a lute saying it is a lute"
> strange then have a look at this promotion text from the same lutenist..
>
> “It is assumed that Bach, just as for the violin and the cello, composed six
> solo suites for lute. But only a few of these incredibly difficult lute
> compositions have been preserved. Eric Bellocq accepted the challenge and
> reconstructed a complete suite cycle. For this purpose, he had a ‘luito
> forte’ built, which all of a sudden makes these compositions quite
> playable!”
>
> Who assumes that there are 6 solo suites for lute, where is the evidence?
> All of the surviving Bach compositions or arrangements have been recorded
> many times, so they are playable on a standard baroque lute.
>
> Eric's text is of course absolute hogwash, but it is the sort of thing that
> some classical promoters probably lap up, not surprising considering that
> huge portions of the mega-narrative of classical music dreamed up in the
> 19th century is equally ridiculous. But wasn't one of the aims of the early
> music movement to try to get beyond these assumptions and myths.
>
> Mark
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Im Auftrag
> von Sauvage Valéry
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 20. Dezember 2009 15:58
> An: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
> Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
>
> I'm not against guitar and guitar players (as a guitar player myself, on
> romantic intrument ;-) but I don't understand why play a guitar in form of a
>
> lute saying it is a lute, as I find my normal lute "forte" enough in itself,
>
> that's all. And after, eveyone makes whatever he wants...
> V.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <terli...@aol.com>
> To: <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 3:30 PM
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: terli...@aol.com
>> To: chriswi...@yahoo.com
>> Sent: Sun, Dec 20, 2009 9:22 am
>> Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I write at the risk of being gummed to death by a horde of irate
>> lutenists:
>>
>>
>> I don't know what kind of guitars and guitar playing lutenists here have
>> been exposed to here but there is a wide variety of types of guitars and
>> playing styles. Hauser style guitar guitars are very good for playing some
>
>> lute music. Smallman type guitars are less good for playing most lute
>> music. To play lute music decently on guitar takes a certain touch...there
>
>> are players that can do it.
>> The guitar (unamplified) works great great in ensemble playing e.g Boulez:
>
>> Le marteau sans maître: Webern op.18,
>> Takemitsu: Ring for Lute,flute and guitar...
>> Best,
>> Mark Delpriora
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: chriswi...@yahoo.com
>> To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; Sauvage Valéry <sauvag...@orange.fr>
>> Sent: Sat, Dec 19, 2009 6:18 pm
>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
>>
>>
>> Valery,
>>
>> --- On Sat, 12/19/09, Sauvage Valéry <sauvag...@orange.fr> wrote:
>>> Ok forte,
>>> we can hear it, but sounds like a guitar (single strung for
>>> the one he used).
>>> So why not play the guitar ? modern and loud instrument you
>>> can play with nails...
>>
>> Really?  I've found the modern classical guitar to be a really, really
>> awful
>> ensemble instrument when dealing with anything else other than other
>> classical
>> guitars or one other instrument/voice.  While the signal coming from it
>> may be
>> technically louder than most types of lutes, it is designed to emphasize
>> the
>> lower partials so that the sound is literally swallowed up by other modern
>> instruments.  This sort of dark timbre can be very effective for a certain
>> portion (but not all) of the solo repertoire, but it really loses its
>> charm in
>> other situations.  This is why A) it MUST be played with nails B) even
>> then it
>> doesn't project particularly well and C) you often hear the instrument
>> amplified
>> in even small ensembles.
>>
>> If you're going to amplify it, what's the point of using that type of
>> guitar
>> (unless you want to make the amplification part of the effect and timbre
>> itself,
>> a la George Crumb)?  This is why I haven't used a classical guitar in any
>> of my
>> ensemble music for years.  A steel-string guitar works very well
>> unamplified in
>> a small ensemble and the electric guitar has no volume limitations at all.
>> Contemporary composers would find much of interest in these instruments
>> and
>> modern classical guitarists would be well advised to think of them as
>> alternate
>> versions of their instrument. Unfortunately, classical players often
>> perceive
>> them as some kind of threat from outside the "official" guitar world.
>>
>> I haven't found this same problem with lutes or theorbos.  The emphasis of
>> higher partials means that the sound on both can cut through quite well.
>> Play
>> close to the bridge and you can be heard most of the time.  I've been
>> thinking
>> of writing a duo for lute and modern guitar.  Maybe now's the time to
>> investigate the project.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "wolfgang wiehe" <wie-w...@gmx.de>
>>> To: <terli...@aol.com>;
>>> <r.turov...@verizon.net>;
>>> <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>>> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 8:05 PM
>>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I heard a "liuto forte" this year at our DLG meeting on
>>> "Burg
>>> Sternberg". Hmm, not louder than my g-lute...;-)
>>> Greetings
>>> W.
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
>>> [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu]
>>> Im
>>> Auftrag von terli...@aol.com
>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 19. Dezember 2009 19:41
>>> An: r.turov...@verizon.net;
>>> lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
>>> Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
>>>
>>>
>>> OR suitable for a guitarist who is NOT sick of the guitar
>>> repertoire!
>>> . and is happy with finger nails.
>>>
>>>
>>> Roman, Did you go to the the demonstration of the liuto
>>> forte hat
>>> occurred at the Met Museum a year or 3 ago?
>>>
>>>
>>> I missed it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark Delpriora
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Roman Turovsky <r.turov...@verizon.net>
>>> To: Lutelist <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>>> Sent: Sat, Dec 19, 2009 11:51 am
>>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
>>>
>>>
>>> It is a single-strung lute and guitar hybrid designed by
>>> Andre Burguete,
>>> that aproximates lute sound while purporting to have the
>>> volume of the
>>> guitar. It uses nylon overspun with fine steel wire, and
>>> has some
>>> interesting and useful peculiarities in the bridge and
>>> soundboard
>>> construction.
>>> Fixed metal frets are supposedly less dampening to the
>>> sound
>>> (negligibly).
>>> This technology might yield a nice and loud theorbo in ET.
>>> But one really misses the overtone palette of double
>>> strings.
>>> It is a very suitable instrument for a guitarist who is
>>> sick of the
>>> guitar repertoire, but is unwilling to part with his
>>> nails.
>>>
>>> http://www.liuto-forte.com/
>>> There are a number of notable converts to it: Oliver
>>> Holzenburg, Luciano
>>> Contini et al.
>>> RT
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Winheld"
>>> <dwinh...@comcast.net>
>>> To: <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>>> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 11:31 AM
>>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Liuto forte
>>>
>>> > Alright,  I'll bite- What in God's name is Liuto
>>> Forte? (I must have
>>> > been out of the office for this one)
>>> > thanks,  Dan
>>> > -- >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > To get on or off this list see list information at
>>> > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to