On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 09:13:12PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Any other opinions? OK sounds like there is enough of a consensus. From what I understand, after explanations Liviu is now OK with this as well. > No, I agree completely. In addition, if our alpha release finds a problem in > qt 5.6 beta, then we can make the qt folks aware of it, and might even get a > fix in qt 5.6.0. Good point. We can bug André :) > >> Once high-res displays are properly supported and the (Qt) bugs worked > >> out, we can again slow down our adaptation of Qt 5.x (and stick with 5.6 > >> or 5.7, depending on what works best in the near future). > > I'd suggest 5.6, since this will be a long term release (the first offical > one for qt) as Stephan mentioned. This is indeed a nice (and lucky timing?) advantage. Scott
